CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
April 2005<br />
4.4 ACTUAL VERSUS EMISSIONS CONTRIBUTIONS<br />
Source apportionment methods are often used to gain insight into the real-world sources of<br />
emissions in order to evaluate emission inventories. Therefore, the relationships between actual<br />
contributions and emissions contributions (defined above as emissions from the 9 5-km grid cells<br />
centered on the receptor) are of interest. The actual contributions present in an air sample could<br />
differ from the local emissions contributions for two main reasons:<br />
• The emissions inventory is spatially inhomogeneous. Air samples integrate source<br />
contributions over some upwind area (footprint) that depends upon wind direction/speed<br />
and atmospheric dispersion properties.<br />
• Emissions from different source categories have different photochemical removal rates<br />
according to their VOC speciation (e.g., see Figures 4-8 and 4-9, above).<br />
The actual emissions contributions for each receptor in experiments 1 on August 5, 1997 are<br />
shown in Figure 4-10 and Table 4-2. The emissions are summarized by the A-<strong>34</strong> categories,<br />
which are listed in Table 4-2. Figure 4-10 shows qualitatively that the distributions of emissions<br />
by source category varied substantially among the receptor locations, with the exception of<br />
Hawthorn and LAX. The same information is provided quantitatively in Table 4-2.<br />
A-<strong>34</strong> category contributions to emissions for 9 cell areas surrounding each receptor<br />
100%<br />
Percent of PAMS<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_22<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_21<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_20<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_19<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_18<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_17<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_16<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_15<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_14<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_13<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_12<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_11<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_10<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_9<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_8<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_7<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_6<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_5<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_4<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_3<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_2<br />
a<strong>34</strong>_1<br />
0%<br />
Anaheim Crestline Diamond Bar Hawthorn Lake Perris LAX Long Beach Van Nuys<br />
Receptor<br />
Figure 4-10. Source category contributions to the sum of PAMS emissions for 9 cell areas<br />
surrounding each receptor in experiment 1 on August 5, 1997.<br />
H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec4.doc 4-20