11.07.2014 Views

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

April 2005<br />

4.4 ACTUAL VERSUS EMISSIONS CONTRIBUTIONS<br />

Source apportionment methods are often used to gain insight into the real-world sources of<br />

emissions in order to evaluate emission inventories. Therefore, the relationships between actual<br />

contributions and emissions contributions (defined above as emissions from the 9 5-km grid cells<br />

centered on the receptor) are of interest. The actual contributions present in an air sample could<br />

differ from the local emissions contributions for two main reasons:<br />

• The emissions inventory is spatially inhomogeneous. Air samples integrate source<br />

contributions over some upwind area (footprint) that depends upon wind direction/speed<br />

and atmospheric dispersion properties.<br />

• Emissions from different source categories have different photochemical removal rates<br />

according to their VOC speciation (e.g., see Figures 4-8 and 4-9, above).<br />

The actual emissions contributions for each receptor in experiments 1 on August 5, 1997 are<br />

shown in Figure 4-10 and Table 4-2. The emissions are summarized by the A-<strong>34</strong> categories,<br />

which are listed in Table 4-2. Figure 4-10 shows qualitatively that the distributions of emissions<br />

by source category varied substantially among the receptor locations, with the exception of<br />

Hawthorn and LAX. The same information is provided quantitatively in Table 4-2.<br />

A-<strong>34</strong> category contributions to emissions for 9 cell areas surrounding each receptor<br />

100%<br />

Percent of PAMS<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_22<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_21<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_20<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_19<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_18<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_17<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_16<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_15<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_14<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_13<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_12<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_11<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_10<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_9<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_8<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_7<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_6<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_5<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_4<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_3<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_2<br />

a<strong>34</strong>_1<br />

0%<br />

Anaheim Crestline Diamond Bar Hawthorn Lake Perris LAX Long Beach Van Nuys<br />

Receptor<br />

Figure 4-10. Source category contributions to the sum of PAMS emissions for 9 cell areas<br />

surrounding each receptor in experiment 1 on August 5, 1997.<br />

H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec4.doc 4-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!