11.07.2014 Views

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 7. THE EMBOUCHURE HOLE AND PLAYER CORRECTIONS 103<br />

Figure 7.3: The pitch correction used by Botros et al. (2006).<br />

tuning as the scale is ascended, <strong>and</strong> the tuning <strong>of</strong> some notes does not match the general trend<br />

(especially C♯5 <strong>and</strong> A♯6). The errant tuning <strong>of</strong> individual notes is easily explained: the placement<br />

<strong>and</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the holes on a flute is always a compromise <strong>and</strong> some tuning anomalies are<br />

tolerated in favour <strong>of</strong> keeping the flute <strong>design</strong> relatively simple <strong>and</strong> not too unwieldy. In particular<br />

the C♯ hole doubles as tone hole for C♯5 <strong>and</strong> C♯6, <strong>and</strong> register hole for D5, D♯5 <strong>and</strong> D6.<br />

This requires a compromise between position (higher than desired for C♯5/6) <strong>and</strong> size (therefore<br />

smaller than desired for C♯5/6). This compromise works better for C♯6 than C♯5 which is<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>able—the pitch <strong>of</strong> C♯5 is more easily adjusted by the player.<br />

A player can always correct the tuning <strong>of</strong> individual notes with her embouchure. The trend<br />

towards sharper tuning over the scale is largely a function <strong>of</strong> the stopper position. The stopper<br />

position <strong>of</strong> 17.5 mm used here is a general guide—flute players adjust this parameter to correct<br />

the tuning—<strong>and</strong> there may well be a different optimum for the flute in question. Moveover,<br />

studies have shown that musicians actually like slightly wide octaves when not played simultaneously<br />

(Ward 1954) <strong>and</strong> this may explain the increase in tuning error with pitch <strong>of</strong> note.<br />

Incidentally, most <strong>of</strong> the notes in Figure 7.2 are sharp. This is due to the relatively short tuning<br />

slide position used in experiments. When informally playing the laboratory flute at A 440 our<br />

resident flutist, Jane Cavanagh, routinely set the slide closer to 8 mm than the 4 mm used here.<br />

Jane also has a fairly open blowhole (hers is the embouchure pictured in Figure 7.1).<br />

For the Virtual <strong>Flute</strong> Botros et al. (2006) used a pitch correction to adjust the tuning derived<br />

from the impedance minima <strong>of</strong> measured spectra in order to match the data <strong>of</strong> Figure 7.2. The<br />

correction used by Botros et al. is shown in Figure 7.3.<br />

7.3 CORRECTION FACTOR<br />

In this thesis, Z face is allowed to vary with played frequency in order to adjust the tuning. The input<br />

impedance <strong>of</strong> the flute is calculated with the temperature gradient given in §2.2.1 through

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!