11.07.2014 Views

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

Flute acoustics: measurement, modelling and design - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2. THEORY AND LITERATURE REVIEW 18<br />

(2.17c). The condition r v = 10 corresponds to a tube diameter <strong>of</strong> approx. 1 mm. Since this is<br />

much smaller than typical bores or tone holes used in flutes, the simplified expressions given<br />

above have been used in this thesis.<br />

2.2.8 Radiation impedance<br />

The impedance at the end <strong>of</strong> an open pipe is small but not negligible, <strong>and</strong> depends on the<br />

frequency, the extent <strong>and</strong> geometry <strong>of</strong> flanging around the open end <strong>and</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> any<br />

occluding objects (such as an overhanging keypad or a player’s finger). In this section I will<br />

compare various theoretical <strong>and</strong> experimental determinations <strong>of</strong> the radiation impedance for<br />

the following cases:<br />

• an unflanged pipe<br />

• an infinite flange<br />

• a circular flange<br />

• a cylindrical flange<br />

• a disk poised over a circular flange.<br />

The real <strong>and</strong> imaginary parts <strong>of</strong> the radiation impedance for both flanged <strong>and</strong> unflanged<br />

pipes are shown in Figure 2.4, in terms <strong>of</strong> the dimensionless quantity ka, where a is the radius<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pipe. In the low frequency limit ka ≪ 1, the impedance is purely reactive <strong>and</strong> equal to the<br />

impedance <strong>of</strong> a short, ideally open section <strong>of</strong> pipe. This leads to the concept <strong>of</strong> a length correction.<br />

To calculate the impedance <strong>of</strong> an open pipe, it is sufficient at low frequencies to calculate<br />

the impedance <strong>of</strong> a slightly longer pipe with a zero load impedance. For higher frequencies the<br />

length correction must be allowed to vary with frequency to give a true representation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

radiation impedance. The small imaginary part <strong>of</strong> the end correction (due to radiation losses<br />

from the end <strong>of</strong> the pipe) must also be included. Following Dalmont et al. (2001), we shall<br />

denote the frequency-dependent end correction by ˜δ <strong>and</strong> the complex, frequency dependent<br />

end-correction by ˜δ ∗ .<br />

The complex, frequency dependent end correction is related to the real, frequency dependent<br />

end correction <strong>and</strong> to the modulus <strong>of</strong> the reflection coefficient according to<br />

˜δ ∗ = ˜δ + i ln(|R|)<br />

2k<br />

(2.18)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the impedance is just the impedance <strong>of</strong> an ideally open pipe <strong>of</strong> length ˜δ ∗ :<br />

Z = iZ 0 tan(k ˜δ ∗ ). (2.19)<br />

2.2.8.1 Unflanged pipe<br />

The low-frequency, lossless end correction for an open unflanged pipe is (Dalmont et al.<br />

2001)<br />

δ open = 0.6133a. (2.20)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!