15.07.2014 Views

NHRD Journal - National HRD Network

NHRD Journal - National HRD Network

NHRD Journal - National HRD Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

communication process because of the<br />

insecurity and uncertainties associated with<br />

the combination process. There are two basic<br />

types of communication that should be<br />

included - first, to keep the organization<br />

members informed about the merger, its<br />

implications, and its implementation and<br />

secondly, to facilitate the work getting done.<br />

In the context of merger, there can be no 'over<br />

communication' - people would welcome<br />

communication. Employees are more likely to<br />

react positively when they are well informed -<br />

about the positive aspects as well as the<br />

negative aspects than when they are forced to<br />

rely on hearsay and speculation. Also, it is<br />

not only important what is communicated,<br />

but also how it is communicated. For<br />

communication to be effective, it needs to be<br />

seen as credible. The information should be<br />

released in an honest, open and timely manner<br />

and there should not be attempts to distort the<br />

truth and manipulate people.<br />

• Co-Opt: For a smooth transition to happen,<br />

there should be an attempt to involve<br />

individuals from both the organizations at<br />

various levels. Setting up of integration<br />

teams, or teams focused on projects, crossfunctional<br />

challenges can be used as<br />

mechanisms for driving this. Integration<br />

teams have been found to be a very effective<br />

mechanism to share information, sort out<br />

operational issues and facilitate execution<br />

of the Integration plan. Moreover, the teams<br />

can serve as conduits of accurate<br />

information and be identified as sources<br />

that employees can turn to. They help the<br />

members to know each other; which help<br />

resolve much of the "we-they" attitude that<br />

inhibits the integration process. The greater<br />

the number of shared experiences that can<br />

be produced early on in the process, the<br />

faster a set of symbols and shared meanings<br />

will develop with which organizational<br />

members begin to identify, which will<br />

facilitate the integration process.<br />

• Collaborate: It is important for a successful<br />

transition that the organizations start<br />

working together and build a culture of<br />

collaboration and trust. In the context of<br />

merger, there might arise, a natural reluctance<br />

to work together. Hence, platforms and<br />

triggers need to be put in place to enable<br />

cooperation. Co-opt is a powerful mechanism<br />

to build trust and facilitate collaboration. In<br />

addition to it, sending the 'Right Signals' help<br />

in this process. Right signals, which appeal<br />

to common values of fairness, respect, care<br />

and reciprocity, serve to break down cultural<br />

barriers and lead to mutual development and<br />

implementation of a common organizational<br />

purpose. Another step in this direction is the<br />

need to enhance reciprocal organizational<br />

understanding. This will enable the<br />

organizations to work on knowledge and<br />

skill transfer, both of which will directly<br />

impact the value creation process.<br />

The intensity and magnitude associated with<br />

each of the Key Actions will depend and vary,<br />

based on the Integration Plan adopted and the<br />

context of the Organization(s). The details - like<br />

when, who, what and how - also need to be<br />

finalized after factoring in the context. It must be<br />

kept in mind that the 4C's are merely the starting<br />

steps in the Integration plan, which would need<br />

to address, along with the macro issues, the issues<br />

at the micro level. At the same time, the Key<br />

Actions (4C's) enable creation of an environment<br />

for successful execution of the Integration Plan.<br />

Conclusions:<br />

• Studies have shown the failure rates in<br />

mergers at 50 percent and one key reason is<br />

the failure to manage people and<br />

organizational issues that arise, in the<br />

context of merger.<br />

• The dynamics involved in the merger<br />

process lead to employees reacting<br />

unfavorably to mergers. This could be due<br />

to culture differences or uncertainty<br />

associated with the process or anxieties on<br />

account of the impact on role; or a<br />

combination of these.<br />

90<br />

November 2007 <strong>N<strong>HRD</strong></strong> <strong>Journal</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!