multivariate poisson hidden markov models for analysis of spatial ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

proportion 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 2 3 4 5 6 7 Number of Components -k Figure 6.6: The mixing proportions for model solutions with k =2 to 7 components for the common covariance multivariate Poisson finite mixture model Table 6.7: Parameter estimates (bootstrapped standard errors) of the five components common covariance model Component θ 1 θ 2 θ 3 θ 123 p j 1 0.1974 0.0000 25.2688 0.0000 0.0242 (0.0610) (0.0385) (0.6622) (0.0263) 2 2.0218 0.1619 9.3893 0.0000 0.1451 (0.1441) (0.0191) (0.1937) (0.0000) 3 3.2147 0.2759 0.5463 0.0369 0.1850 (0.0784) (0.0143) (0.0988) (0.0051) 4 0.8218 0.4365 2.9303 0.0278 0.2424 (0.0272) 5 0.4487 (0.0272) (0.0056) 0.1307 (0.0056) (0.0037) 0.0494 (0.0037) (0.0039) 0.0000 (0.0000) 0.4032 120
Figure 6.7 illustrates the evolution of the loglikelihood for different componets ( k =1,…,7) of the restricted covariance multivariate Poisson finite mixture model. -600 -650 -700 -750 Loglikelihood -800 -850 -900 -950 -1000 -1050 -1100 -1150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k (the number of Components) Loglikelihood AIC BIC Figure 6.7: Loglikelihood, AIC and BIC against the number of components for the restricted covariance multivariate Poisson finite mixture model 121
Page 1 and 2:
MULTIVARIATE POISSON HIDDEN MARKOV
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT Multivariate count data ar
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First I would like
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSION TO USE
Page 9 and 10:
6.4 Data analysis..................
Page 11 and 12:
Table 7.7: Loglikelihood and AIC to
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 6.10: Loglikelihood, AIC and
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1
Page 17 and 18:
North Carolina, is modelled by Symo
Page 19 and 20:
concept of Markov models to include
Page 21 and 22:
egularity constraints on the underl
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 2 HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS ( HM
Page 25 and 26:
Given the coin tossing experiment,
Page 27 and 28:
P 11 P 22 P 12 1 2 P 21 P 32 P 13 P
Page 29 and 30:
0.8 0.6 0.2 1 0.4 2 (1) P [H]=2/3 (
Page 31 and 32:
… Urn 1 Urn 2 Urn N P[Red]= b 1 (
Page 33 and 34:
5. The probability distribution of
Page 35 and 36:
focus of this section. Random field
Page 37 and 38:
Now consider a random field { X ( s
Page 39 and 40:
for some real β . Again, the denom
Page 41 and 42:
Since original HMMs were designed a
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 3 INFERENCE IN HIDDEN MARKO
Page 45 and 46:
sequence. If we have several compet
Page 47 and 48:
Using this equation we can calculat
Page 49 and 50:
3.2.2 Problem 2 and its solution Gi
Page 51 and 52:
Letting Ut( S1 = i1, S2 = i2,..., S
Page 53 and 54:
ξ α () iPβ ( jb ) ( y ) t ij t+
Page 55 and 56:
ˆ ( n) = b j Expected Number of ti
Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 4 HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL AND T
Page 59 and 60:
4.2.1 Wild Oats Figure 4.1: Wild Oa
Page 61 and 62:
4.2.2.1 Effects on crop quality Wil
Page 63 and 64:
at each of the 150 grid locations (
Page 65 and 66:
In the literature review (section 1
Page 67 and 68:
estimated through the observations
Page 69 and 70:
CHAPTER 5 MULTIVARIATE POISSON DIST
Page 71 and 72:
Y Y Y 1 2 3 = X = X 1 = X 2 3 + X +
Page 73 and 74:
educe the computational burden; how
Page 75 and 76:
and y 3 as illustrated above. Again
Page 77 and 78:
q In general, the number of paramet
Page 79 and 80:
Similar to the fully structured mod
Page 81 and 82:
ecause the former captures more of
Page 83 and 84: (Tsiamyrtzis and Karlis, 2004). The
Page 85 and 86: notation, the following recursive s
Page 87 and 88: 5.2.2 The multivariate Poisson dist
Page 89 and 90: ypy ( ,0,0) = θ py ( − 1,0,0) y1
Page 91 and 92: ecurrence relationship ypy 1 ( 1 ,
Page 93 and 94: Raftery, 1998); identification of t
Page 95 and 96: maximization (EM) algorithm is appl
Page 97 and 98: the EM algorithms for use on very l
Page 99 and 100: Another alternative is to use the p
Page 101 and 102: 5.3.5 Estimation for the multivaria
Page 103 and 104: j j E[ X 12 i | Yi , Z ij = 1, Φ ]
Page 105 and 106: 5.4 Multivariate Poisson hidden Mar
Page 107 and 108: where P = Pr( S = k | S − 1 j), 1
Page 109 and 110: P jk n ∑ vˆ jk i= 2 = n m ∑∑
Page 111 and 112: E[ X | Y, u ( i) = 1, Φ ] = d = y
Page 113 and 114: The bootstrap method is a powerful
Page 115 and 116: eplications are generally sufficien
Page 117 and 118: Y and assumes a probability distrib
Page 119 and 120: For the case of two categorical var
Page 121 and 122: ejected. In this situation, the (sm
Page 123 and 124: the Poisson distribution is well su
Page 125 and 126: 0 1 2 3 4 Wild Buckwheat species109
Page 127 and 128: Table 6.4: The frequency of occurre
Page 129 and 130: 6.4.1 Results for the different mul
Page 131 and 132: Proportion 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5
Page 133: -600 -650 -700 Loglikelihood -750 -
Page 137 and 138: Table 6.8: Parameter estimates (boo
Page 139 and 140: common covariance and the four stat
Page 141 and 142: -600 -700 -800 Loglikelihood -900 -
Page 143 and 144: Table 6.11: Parameter estimates (bo
Page 145 and 146: 6.5 Comparison of the different mod
Page 147 and 148: loglikelihood providing at least a
Page 149 and 150: illustrates the contour plot of the
Page 151 and 152: (a) Independent Contour 1 Contour 2
Page 153 and 154: Karlis and Meligkotsidou (2006) dis
Page 155 and 156: The mean vector and the covariance
Page 157 and 158: The simple moments of B are polynom
Page 159 and 160: and E ( Y ) = AM where ⎡λ1 ⎤
Page 161 and 162: 7.5 Applications In addition to wee
Page 163 and 164: The estimated covariance matrix and
Page 165 and 166: The estimated covariance matrix (AI
Page 167 and 168: Table 7.6 Bacterial counts by 3 sam
Page 169 and 170: Table 7.8: Loglikelihood and AIC to
Page 171 and 172: (c) Finite mixture with the five co
Page 173 and 174: (i) Hidden Markov model with the fi
Page 175 and 176: CHAPTER 8 COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY
Page 177 and 178: less time compared to the multivari
Page 179 and 180: 1400 1200 CPU time (1/100 second) 1
Page 181 and 182: 1400 1200 CPU time (1/100 second) 1
Page 183 and 184: In this thesis, three species count
Page 185 and 186:
In the applications of the HMMs, li
Page 187 and 188:
indication of the relative goodness
Page 189 and 190:
underlying data. The advantage of t
Page 191 and 192:
9.6 Further research We can present
Page 193 and 194:
REFERENCES 1. Aas, K., Eikvil, L. a
Page 195 and 196:
17. Bicego, M., Murino, V. & Figuei
Page 197 and 198:
33. Descombes, X., Morris, R.D., Ze
Page 199 and 200:
Department of Statistics, Universit
Page 201 and 202:
66. Li C.S., Lu J.C., Park J., Kim
Page 203 and 204:
85. Petrie T. (1969). Probabilistic
Page 205 and 206:
104. University of Manitoba, Depart
Page 207 and 208:
z0
Page 209 and 210:
threep2[i]
Page 211 and 212:
loglike[nit]
Page 213 and 214:
theta33
Page 215 and 216:
} prob[g1+1, g2 + 1]
Page 217 and 218:
theta131
Page 219 and 220:
threep22[i]
Page 221 and 222:
dens=matrix(0,nrow=T,ncol=N) alpha=
Page 223 and 224:
# vˆ jk ( i) = P jk f ( y ; λ i
show all

multivariate poisson hidden markov models for analysis of spatial ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?