Weeki Wachee River System Recommended Minimum Flows and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

October 8,2008 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Commissioners Rodney Barreto Chair Miami Brian S. Yablonski Vice-Chair Tallahassee Kathy Barco lacksonville Ronald M. Bergeron Fort Lauderdale Richard A. Corbett Tampa Dwight Stephenson Delray Beach Kenneth W. Wright Winter Park Executive Staff Kenneth D. Haddad Executive Director Nick Wiley Assistant Executive Director Karen Ventimiglia Deputy Chief of Staff Office of Policy and Stakeholder Coordination Mary Ann Poole Director (850) 41S5272 (850) 922-5679 FAX Managing fish and wildlife resources for their longterm well-being and the benefit of people. 620 South Meridian Street Tallahassee. Florida 32399-1600 Voice: (850) 488-4676 Hearinuspeech impaired: (800) 955-8771 (T) (800) 955-8770 (V) MyFWC.com Martin Kelly, Ph.D. Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Re: Weeki Wachee River System recommended Minimum Flow and Level, Hernando County Dear Dr. Kelly: The MarineIEstuarine Subsection of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Division of Habitat and Species Conservation has coordinated the agency review of the recornrnended Minimum Flows and Levels (MFL) for the Weeki Wachee River System. Provided below are FWC's comments and recommendations regarding this MFL. Project Description To protect Florida's water resources fiom "significant harm" the Florida Legislature directed the Florida Water Management Districts to establish MFLs for lakes, streams, and rivers (Chapter 373.042, Florida Statutes.). In compliance with this legislative directive the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) has drafted a recornrnended MFL for the Weeki Wachee River System. The Weeki Wachee River flows over 7 miles fiom its starting point at Weeki Wachee Spring. This river system has a 38-square-mile watershed and an approximate 260-square-mile springshed. The SWFWMD used the time frame of 1984 to 2004 to establish a baseline flow that averaged 162 cubic feet per second (cfs) for the Weeki Wachee River. Potentially Affected Resources Anthropogenic effects mainly in the form of groundwater withdrawals have resulted in an estimated 17 cfs decline in spring flow since 1961. The reduction of flow within both the watershed and springshed could affect spring, riverine, and estuarine habitats along with their associated diverse assemblage of fish and wildlife. The SWFWMD examined a variety of environmental indicators for their sensitivity to a reduction of flow levels. The resources considered included fish, invertebrates, mollusks, manatee warm-water habitat, benthic communities, submerged aquatic vegetation, and salinity regimes. Modeling evaluations of these resources did not indicate a break-point or resource collapse for any of these factors before reaching a 15% change in habitat availability, which is the SWFWMD's measure for significant harm that was based on Gore et al. (2002). The most restrictive outcome was found in the changes for the salinity regime of the lower river, which would have resulted in the MFL being based on a predicted shift in the 15 parts per thousand (ppt) isohaline; however, these results were deemed unreliable due to the influence of the Mud River and its highly saline flow. The flow from the Mud River
Martin Kelly, Ph.D. Page 2 October 8, 2008 has been sporadically measured and these measurements have indicated a highly variable flow of -5 1 to +I28 C~S. Due to these variable conditions, the 15-ppt isohaline was not selected as the determining factor for the MFL; rather the MFL is based on a mean percent flow reduction of all composite criteria used during a high-flow period and a low-flow period. The mean flow reduction of all the criteria used is recommended as being 10.1 % during low-flow scenarios and 10.7% during high-flow scenarios. The SWFWMD has noted that these reductions would take into account current flow reductions (about 9.5% reduction when compared to baseline period average to date) due to groundwater withdrawals, so remaining reduction capacity would be between 0.6 and 1.2% in flow. Comments and Recommendations Due to the proposed MFL, we expect a small reduction of existing manatee warm-water habitat in the Weeki Wachee River. Warm-water habitat is considered the limiting factor for the manatee population in Florida. This becomes considerably more relevant when projections into the future suggest that warm-water habitat created by the thermal discharges of coastal power plants will diminish, which could affect over half of the estimated manatee population that currently uses them. Warm-water habitat for manatees provided by natural spring systems is therefore critical to the recovery of this species into the future. Although a relatively small number of manatees currently use the Weeki Wachee River as a warm-water refuge, this can change rather quickly as history has shown at Volusia Blue Spring. Over the course of 38 years manatee use of Volusia Blue Spring increased over 1700% (n = 11 in 1970 to n = 202 in 2008). The FWC believes the SWFWMD's use of an average of 10 manatees using Weeki Wachee River as a warm-water site is an underestimate. The Weeki Wachee River has had few winter aerial surveys, which have been conducted under less than optimal visibility conditions due to the abundant vegetation overhanging the river along its margins. The all-time high count number of 34 manatees observed on February 13,2006, is an indication that many more manatees are familiar with, and use, this warm-water rehge; and manatees are documented as exhibiting a great degree of site fidelity in the use of warm-water rehges. Conclusion The SWFWMD's proposed minimum flow level set at a 10% reduction in historic flow would reduce manatee warm-water habitat fi-om the area and volume that was available within the Weeki Wachee River system historically. The FWC does not advocate a loss of warm-water habitat; however, the proposed 10% reduction in the baseline flow of the Weeki Wachee River system has already largely occurred and represents the current system. Summary The FWC compliments the SWFWMD on its thorough review of the data and potential impacts to the natural resources of this river system. After reviewing the information
Page 1:
Weeki Wachee River System Recommend
Page 4 and 5:
Conversion Table Metric to U.S. Cus
Page 6 and 7:
5.2 FISH ..........................
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 3-2 Location of Bathymetric
Page 10 and 11:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Rule-of-Th
Page 12 and 13:
Table 8-1 Summary of Weeki Wachee M
Page 14 and 15:
Executive Summary Minimum Flows and
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE & BACKGROUND OF
Page 18 and 19:
1) flood flows that determine the b
Page 20 and 21:
the area." What constitutes "signif
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1-1 Rule-of-Thumb Estimates f
Page 24 and 25:
this report identifies specific res
Page 26 and 27:
1.6 Content of Remaining Chapters I
Page 28 and 29:
CHAPTER 2 - WATERSHED CHARACTERISTI
Page 30 and 31:
# # # circular vent 1.8 meters in d
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 2-5 1970s Aerial with 1999 U
Page 34 and 35:
is a variation of the Seminole word
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2-6 Hurricane Tracks near Ba
Page 38 and 39:
varied by period. The variation was
Page 40 and 41:
2.3.2 Baseline Period Figure 2-10 i
Page 42 and 43:
found (ktau p=0.06) between total g
Page 44 and 45:
similarly across the springsheds ex
Page 46 and 47:
Figure 2-15 Wavelet Filtered Discha
Page 48 and 49:
Figure 2-16 INTB Groundwater Model
Page 50 and 51:
2.6 Seasonal Blocks As described in
Page 52 and 53:
Table 2-6 Median (cfs) Flow by Bloc
Page 54 and 55:
# # # Surface waters in this stretc
Page 56 and 57:
3.1.3 Segmentation Segmentation was
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 3-5 Dominant SAV and Median
Page 60 and 61:
Figure 3-6 Sediment Characteristics
Page 62 and 63:
Figure 3-7 Shoreline / Buffer Veget
Page 64 and 65:
CHAPTER 4 - TIDE, SALINITY & WATER
Page 66 and 67:
Two additional harmonic pairs were
Page 68 and 69:
Figure 4-5. Median Bottom Salinity
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 4-7 Salinity Range (1984-200
Page 72 and 73:
uncovering in response to strong wi
Page 74 and 75:
E) Salinity = β o + β 1 *Flow 2 +
Page 76 and 77:
Additional exploratory attempts usi
Page 78 and 79:
86 = 186 cfs, SWFWMD 1994-96 = 167
Page 80 and 81:
A regression of the form below was
Page 82 and 83:
Table 4-8 Median Water Quality of W
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 4-10 Nitrate Concentration a
Page 86 and 87:
CHAPTER 5 - BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIST
Page 88 and 89:
Figure 5-1 Principal Component Anal
Page 90 and 91:
measured volume sampled which was t
Page 92 and 93:
5.2.2 Relation to inflow Response t
Page 94 and 95:
Table 5-7 Location Response (km u )
Page 96 and 97:
Table 5-9 Abundance Response to Inf
Page 98 and 99:
animals can survive chronic exposur
Page 100 and 101:
Figure 5-3 Number of Aerial Manatee
Page 102 and 103:
Figure 5-5(a) Molluscan Presence /
Page 104 and 105:
Table 5-11 Rank Order of Mollusc Ab
Page 106 and 107:
Figure 5-5 Polymesoda caroliniana A
Page 108 and 109:
Figure 6-1 Plankton Tow Flows Compa
Page 110 and 111:
In application, a baseline area and
Page 112 and 113:
6.1.4 Benthos Protection for benthi
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 6-3. Location of the Three P
Page 116 and 117:
7.2 Manatee Approach Establishing a
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 7-2 Joint Probability of Occ
Page 120 and 121:
Figure 7-3 Maximum Day Manatee Usag
Page 122 and 123:
Figure 7- 6 Example Calculations fo
Page 124 and 125:
Figure 7- 7 Estimation of Flow Redu
Page 126 and 127:
Figure 7-8. Summary Results for the
Page 128 and 129:
The reductions in flow that meet th
Page 130 and 131:
probably accounts in part for the d
Page 132 and 133: Postel, S. and B.Richter. 2003. Riv
Page 134 and 135: Stanford, J.A., J.V.Ward, W.J. Liss
Page 136 and 137: Culter, J.K. 1986. Water Chemistry.
Page 138 and 139: CHAPTER 10 - APPENDICES 10.1 Append
Page 140 and 141: The wavelet used is the symmlets wa
Page 142 and 143: explains, the energy plot shows the
Page 144 and 145: 0 if no significant withdrawal Z =
Page 146 and 147: One advantage of using this regress
Page 148 and 149: Technical Memorandum January 22, 20
Page 150 and 151: Lecanto 1 & 2 #S Well Site Descript
Page 152 and 153: Figure 4. HSPF subbasins in the INT
Page 154 and 155: Most of the limestone mines located
Page 156 and 157: 3.1.3 Septic Tank Recharge in the S
Page 158 and 159: Figure 10. Groundwater grid in the
Page 160 and 161: Basso, R.J., 2004, Hydrogeologic Se
Page 162 and 163: 10.2 Appendices - Chapter 3 Appendi
Page 164 and 165: 10.3 Appendices - Chapter 4 Appendi
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 4-2 Data Sources Water qua
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 4-3 Water Quality Trend Gr
Page 170 and 171: Water Quality Trend Graphics, conti
Page 180 and 181: United States Department of the Int
Page 184 and 185: Martin Kelly, Ph.D. Page 3 October
Page 186 and 187: Scientific Peer Review of the Propo
Page 188 and 189: Determining a low flow need during
Page 190 and 191: Current state water policy, as expr
Page 192 and 193: Spring, Twin Dees Spring and possib
Page 194 and 195: under varying flow regimes. The fir
Page 196 and 197: Weeki Wachee Rainfall, Springflow a
Page 198 and 199: 6.0 Discharge:Precipitation (cfs/in
Page 200 and 201: Nevertheless, a major concern with
Page 202 and 203: system grid is not totally orthogon
Page 204 and 205: In a hydrodynamic model study, one
Page 206 and 207: analysis was rather cursory. The Di
Page 208 and 209: (taxa) richness in the WWRS. If the
Page 210 and 211: Freshwater Habitats Approximately 1
Page 212 and 213: ERRATA and EDITORIAL COMMENTS Page
Page 214 and 215: Page Paragraph Line Comment 14 Some
Page 216 and 217: Page Paragraph Line Comment 21 The
Page 218 and 219: Page Paragraph Line Comment 26 The
Page 220 and 221: REFERENCES Alber, M. 2002. A Concep
Page 222 and 223: Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner,
Page 224 and 225: the regression equation used to pre
Page 226 and 227: and the three independent approache
Page 228 and 229: The Southwest Florida Water Managem
Page 230 and 231: the model in terms of tides, salini
Page 232 and 233:
Attachment 1 - Comparison of salini
Page 234 and 235:
Figure 1. Predicted drawdown (feet)
show all

Weeki Wachee River System Recommended Minimum Flows and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?