20.10.2014 Views

industry and environment - DTIE

industry and environment - DTIE

industry and environment - DTIE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chemicals management<br />

Aliphatic<br />

compound<br />

Styrene<br />

Butadeine<br />

Other<br />

compounds<br />

Energy<br />

Mixing<br />

Heating<br />

Vapours<br />

venting<br />

Reaction<br />

Wastewater<br />

with<br />

aromatic<br />

This business case (described in greater detail<br />

below) lasted almost a year, involving continuous<br />

interaction with the researcher, sharing of technical<br />

information <strong>and</strong> making her more aware of<br />

<strong>environment</strong>al considerations.<br />

Business case: solvent-based adhesives<br />

Solvent-based adhesives are solvent <strong>and</strong> resin mixtures<br />

that harden as the solvent evaporates. The<br />

use of polyurethanes in adhesives has several<br />

advantages, such as good adhesion to metal <strong>and</strong><br />

or to paper sheets <strong>and</strong> heat resistance.<br />

Most adhesives, including polyurethane ones,<br />

are formulated with some solvents, either VOCs<br />

(volatile organic compounds) or HAPs (hazardous<br />

air pollutants). The most common solvents used<br />

in formulating adhesives are hexane, methylethylcetone,<br />

phenol, toluene, xylenes <strong>and</strong> thinner.<br />

Worldwide regulatory requirements are leading<br />

to the substitution of a number of chemicals. In<br />

the case of adhesives, one option is to use less of<br />

these products. Another is to find alternate solvents<br />

not included on the list of VOCs or HAPs. 2<br />

In the United States, the DfE Adhesives Technologies<br />

Partnership Program looks for solvents<br />

or alternate technologies that could be developed<br />

for the purpose of mitigating health <strong>and</strong> <strong>environment</strong>al<br />

impacts resulting from these products’<br />

use. 3<br />

Work consisted of characterizing the materials<br />

currently being used <strong>and</strong> identifying replacements<br />

if necessary. In this instance, removal of a toxic<br />

aromatic compound was proposed.<br />

Figure 2<br />

Flow chart: modified rubber<br />

Oxidizing<br />

compound<br />

Liquid<br />

rubber<br />

Energy<br />

Mixing<br />

Heating<br />

Modification<br />

Water<br />

Modified<br />

rubber<br />

Energy<br />

Mixing<br />

Heating<br />

Other<br />

compounds<br />

Coagulation<br />

(washing <strong>and</strong><br />

drying)<br />

Aliphatic<br />

compound<br />

Inorganic<br />

compound<br />

Solid<br />

rubber<br />

■ Evaluated elements<br />

Social aspects<br />

Social aspects were:<br />

◆ reduction of chronic exposure to personnel;<br />

◆ elimination of community risks related to transport<br />

of the solvent;<br />

◆ development of a product for consumption by<br />

children that is free of toxic compounds.<br />

Product profitability<br />

Both the solvent <strong>and</strong> the replacement material are<br />

imported. The cost of the replacement material<br />

was much lower; forming links with the new foreign<br />

supplier had economic benefits.<br />

Capitalizing on experience for use in<br />

education<br />

Conclusions reached for this stage are:<br />

◆ The major difficulty with incorporating DfE in<br />

◆ Environmental impact<br />

◆ Disposal cost<br />

Disposal<br />

Recycling<br />

Remanufacturing<br />

Figure 3<br />

Product life cycle<br />

Raw material<br />

extraction<br />

researchers’ work is that their paradigm of thinking<br />

in terms of product performance alone has to<br />

be changed. Making researchers aware of the life<br />

cycle concept is a good way to encourage them to<br />

broaden their vision of new product design;<br />

◆ At the beginning, researchers refused to recognize<br />

the value added by DfE. It was eventually<br />

implemented as a result of their own convictions;<br />

◆ Thinking <strong>environment</strong>ally added to the difficulty<br />

of researchers’ work at first, but they came<br />

to feel satisfied about the product’s more comprehensive<br />

design.<br />

When researchers allow themselves to seek<br />

alternatives, these alternatives can be found. First<br />

of all, however, they must be convinced that there<br />

is such a need, <strong>and</strong> this may take months.<br />

Third stage: Progressive DFE<br />

implementation<br />

In the third stage, two ongoing technological projects<br />

were chosen: one in the pilot phase (Figure<br />

2) <strong>and</strong> the other in the commercial phase.<br />

In accordance with the outcome of the second<br />

stage, where the need to educate people about<br />

DfE was identified, the strategy chosen was to<br />

appoint a DfE-trained engineer to follow the<br />

researchers closely in their tasks <strong>and</strong> to identify<br />

<strong>environment</strong>al opportunities. Working from the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>point of the product’s life cycle (Figure 3)<br />

was a novelty for the researchers.<br />

The most difficult barrier to overcome in constructing<br />

a bridge for communication between<br />

researchers <strong>and</strong> the DfE advisor was the<br />

researchers’ feeling of ownership of their work.<br />

Communication slowly began to flow once the<br />

researchers recognized that DfE could enrich what<br />

they do. At the end of this stage, the advisor was<br />

required for many more tasks, not only those<br />

◆ Efficiency of transforming<br />

resources<br />

◆ Emissions, energy, air,<br />

water <strong>and</strong> soil<br />

◆ Impact on surroundings<br />

◆ Use of renewable <strong>and</strong><br />

non-renewable resources<br />

◆ Impact on surroundings<br />

(<strong>environment</strong>al, social <strong>and</strong><br />

economic)<br />

Manufacture<br />

Environmental <strong>and</strong> safety benefits<br />

The <strong>environment</strong>al <strong>and</strong> safety benefits of using a<br />

different material were:<br />

◆ reduction in the pollution burden on subsoil<br />

due to waste from the manufacturing process, as<br />

well as to the packaging in which solvent is marketed,<br />

as toxic waste disposal (including the containers)<br />

is to l<strong>and</strong>fill;<br />

◆ not increasing generation of photochemical<br />

smog; elimination of emissions of organic vapour;<br />

◆ improved product safety, eliminating the risk to<br />

the user arising from vapour emissions of residual<br />

solvent.<br />

◆ Product risks<br />

◆ Economic value<br />

Reuse<br />

Use<br />

◆ Risks en route:<br />

community,<br />

<strong>environment</strong>,<br />

facilities<br />

◆ Economic impact<br />

◆ Risks for community,<br />

<strong>environment</strong> <strong>and</strong> facilities<br />

◆ Economic assessment<br />

of the above<br />

Transportation<br />

UNEP Industry <strong>and</strong> Environment April – September 2004 ◆ 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!