industry and environment - DTIE
industry and environment - DTIE
industry and environment - DTIE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chemicals management<br />
Aliphatic<br />
compound<br />
Styrene<br />
Butadeine<br />
Other<br />
compounds<br />
Energy<br />
Mixing<br />
Heating<br />
Vapours<br />
venting<br />
Reaction<br />
Wastewater<br />
with<br />
aromatic<br />
This business case (described in greater detail<br />
below) lasted almost a year, involving continuous<br />
interaction with the researcher, sharing of technical<br />
information <strong>and</strong> making her more aware of<br />
<strong>environment</strong>al considerations.<br />
Business case: solvent-based adhesives<br />
Solvent-based adhesives are solvent <strong>and</strong> resin mixtures<br />
that harden as the solvent evaporates. The<br />
use of polyurethanes in adhesives has several<br />
advantages, such as good adhesion to metal <strong>and</strong><br />
or to paper sheets <strong>and</strong> heat resistance.<br />
Most adhesives, including polyurethane ones,<br />
are formulated with some solvents, either VOCs<br />
(volatile organic compounds) or HAPs (hazardous<br />
air pollutants). The most common solvents used<br />
in formulating adhesives are hexane, methylethylcetone,<br />
phenol, toluene, xylenes <strong>and</strong> thinner.<br />
Worldwide regulatory requirements are leading<br />
to the substitution of a number of chemicals. In<br />
the case of adhesives, one option is to use less of<br />
these products. Another is to find alternate solvents<br />
not included on the list of VOCs or HAPs. 2<br />
In the United States, the DfE Adhesives Technologies<br />
Partnership Program looks for solvents<br />
or alternate technologies that could be developed<br />
for the purpose of mitigating health <strong>and</strong> <strong>environment</strong>al<br />
impacts resulting from these products’<br />
use. 3<br />
Work consisted of characterizing the materials<br />
currently being used <strong>and</strong> identifying replacements<br />
if necessary. In this instance, removal of a toxic<br />
aromatic compound was proposed.<br />
Figure 2<br />
Flow chart: modified rubber<br />
Oxidizing<br />
compound<br />
Liquid<br />
rubber<br />
Energy<br />
Mixing<br />
Heating<br />
Modification<br />
Water<br />
Modified<br />
rubber<br />
Energy<br />
Mixing<br />
Heating<br />
Other<br />
compounds<br />
Coagulation<br />
(washing <strong>and</strong><br />
drying)<br />
Aliphatic<br />
compound<br />
Inorganic<br />
compound<br />
Solid<br />
rubber<br />
■ Evaluated elements<br />
Social aspects<br />
Social aspects were:<br />
◆ reduction of chronic exposure to personnel;<br />
◆ elimination of community risks related to transport<br />
of the solvent;<br />
◆ development of a product for consumption by<br />
children that is free of toxic compounds.<br />
Product profitability<br />
Both the solvent <strong>and</strong> the replacement material are<br />
imported. The cost of the replacement material<br />
was much lower; forming links with the new foreign<br />
supplier had economic benefits.<br />
Capitalizing on experience for use in<br />
education<br />
Conclusions reached for this stage are:<br />
◆ The major difficulty with incorporating DfE in<br />
◆ Environmental impact<br />
◆ Disposal cost<br />
Disposal<br />
Recycling<br />
Remanufacturing<br />
Figure 3<br />
Product life cycle<br />
Raw material<br />
extraction<br />
researchers’ work is that their paradigm of thinking<br />
in terms of product performance alone has to<br />
be changed. Making researchers aware of the life<br />
cycle concept is a good way to encourage them to<br />
broaden their vision of new product design;<br />
◆ At the beginning, researchers refused to recognize<br />
the value added by DfE. It was eventually<br />
implemented as a result of their own convictions;<br />
◆ Thinking <strong>environment</strong>ally added to the difficulty<br />
of researchers’ work at first, but they came<br />
to feel satisfied about the product’s more comprehensive<br />
design.<br />
When researchers allow themselves to seek<br />
alternatives, these alternatives can be found. First<br />
of all, however, they must be convinced that there<br />
is such a need, <strong>and</strong> this may take months.<br />
Third stage: Progressive DFE<br />
implementation<br />
In the third stage, two ongoing technological projects<br />
were chosen: one in the pilot phase (Figure<br />
2) <strong>and</strong> the other in the commercial phase.<br />
In accordance with the outcome of the second<br />
stage, where the need to educate people about<br />
DfE was identified, the strategy chosen was to<br />
appoint a DfE-trained engineer to follow the<br />
researchers closely in their tasks <strong>and</strong> to identify<br />
<strong>environment</strong>al opportunities. Working from the<br />
st<strong>and</strong>point of the product’s life cycle (Figure 3)<br />
was a novelty for the researchers.<br />
The most difficult barrier to overcome in constructing<br />
a bridge for communication between<br />
researchers <strong>and</strong> the DfE advisor was the<br />
researchers’ feeling of ownership of their work.<br />
Communication slowly began to flow once the<br />
researchers recognized that DfE could enrich what<br />
they do. At the end of this stage, the advisor was<br />
required for many more tasks, not only those<br />
◆ Efficiency of transforming<br />
resources<br />
◆ Emissions, energy, air,<br />
water <strong>and</strong> soil<br />
◆ Impact on surroundings<br />
◆ Use of renewable <strong>and</strong><br />
non-renewable resources<br />
◆ Impact on surroundings<br />
(<strong>environment</strong>al, social <strong>and</strong><br />
economic)<br />
Manufacture<br />
Environmental <strong>and</strong> safety benefits<br />
The <strong>environment</strong>al <strong>and</strong> safety benefits of using a<br />
different material were:<br />
◆ reduction in the pollution burden on subsoil<br />
due to waste from the manufacturing process, as<br />
well as to the packaging in which solvent is marketed,<br />
as toxic waste disposal (including the containers)<br />
is to l<strong>and</strong>fill;<br />
◆ not increasing generation of photochemical<br />
smog; elimination of emissions of organic vapour;<br />
◆ improved product safety, eliminating the risk to<br />
the user arising from vapour emissions of residual<br />
solvent.<br />
◆ Product risks<br />
◆ Economic value<br />
Reuse<br />
Use<br />
◆ Risks en route:<br />
community,<br />
<strong>environment</strong>,<br />
facilities<br />
◆ Economic impact<br />
◆ Risks for community,<br />
<strong>environment</strong> <strong>and</strong> facilities<br />
◆ Economic assessment<br />
of the above<br />
Transportation<br />
UNEP Industry <strong>and</strong> Environment April – September 2004 ◆ 49