27.10.2014 Views

Sheba

Sheba

Sheba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108<br />

THE KEBRA NAGAST<br />

The Caleb Cycle of the Kebra Nagast is sometimes dated between the<br />

reign of the eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperor Justin I (A.D. 518-527)<br />

and before madness overcame Justin II (A.D. 571). The reasoning behind<br />

this is that the Caleb Cycle treats the death of the eastern Roman emperor<br />

Marcian (A.D. 457), last of the male imperial Theodosian line, as a<br />

consequence of his convening the Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451) that<br />

rejected Monophysitism. It refers to Justin I as a co-religionist, hence a<br />

Monophysite, but makes no mention of Justin II’s later years when his<br />

insanity had advanced to such a stage that he had himself wheeled round in<br />

a small cart so he could bite his subjects’ legs. If the Caleb Cycle had been<br />

written during or after this time, it would have used this madness as an<br />

example of the consequences of rejecting Monophysitism. However,<br />

references to both Justins and to Marcian come at the end of the Kebra<br />

Nagast in the same section as the fourteenth century monarch Amda Seyon.<br />

In addition, the references to Marcian and other issues are inaccurate, so it<br />

is probable that the whole of this late section was written in the early 1300s<br />

not in the 500s as is the rest of the Caleb Cycle. The Caleb Cycle speaks of<br />

the emperor Marcian as being vanquished by the Persians. The writer<br />

seems to have confused Marcian, who suffered no such fate, with a later<br />

ruler. During and after the Himyarite War the Byzantines were in frequent<br />

diplomatic contact with Aksum, but it seems the authors of the Kebra<br />

Nagast did not have access to pertinent records. The Caleb Cycle states<br />

Justin I and Caleb met before launching their campaigns against the Jewish<br />

movements in Armenia and in Himyar. Such a meeting never took place,<br />

and Justin’s name may have been confused with Julian, an envoy whom the<br />

Emperor Justinian (A.D. 527–565) dispatched to Aksum. The Caleb Cycle<br />

also confuses Justin’s Armenian campaign with the Persian campaign<br />

against the Jewish state of Mahoza. It is Mahoza that was linked to Yusuf’s<br />

rising in Himyar/Yemen. Justin’s campaign was in the region of modern<br />

Armenia and Georgia, where there were demographically insignificant<br />

isolated Jewish groups, including blacksmiths of African descent in Colchis,<br />

whose ancestors, according to Herodotus, had been exiled by the Assyrians.<br />

These Jewish groups do not seem to have led a major rebellion against the<br />

Byzantines. The confusion between Justin’s campaign and the Persian<br />

campaign must have been partly due to references to “Armenia,” whose<br />

boundaries once included much of modern Turkey and Iraq. Lastly, the<br />

Caleb Cycle only briefly refers to Caleb’s crusade against Jewish Himyar,<br />

although other highly detailed Monophysite accounts in Syriac exist. All<br />

this evidence points to the bulk of the Caleb Cycle being written at the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!