Sheba
Sheba
Sheba
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
108<br />
THE KEBRA NAGAST<br />
The Caleb Cycle of the Kebra Nagast is sometimes dated between the<br />
reign of the eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperor Justin I (A.D. 518-527)<br />
and before madness overcame Justin II (A.D. 571). The reasoning behind<br />
this is that the Caleb Cycle treats the death of the eastern Roman emperor<br />
Marcian (A.D. 457), last of the male imperial Theodosian line, as a<br />
consequence of his convening the Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451) that<br />
rejected Monophysitism. It refers to Justin I as a co-religionist, hence a<br />
Monophysite, but makes no mention of Justin II’s later years when his<br />
insanity had advanced to such a stage that he had himself wheeled round in<br />
a small cart so he could bite his subjects’ legs. If the Caleb Cycle had been<br />
written during or after this time, it would have used this madness as an<br />
example of the consequences of rejecting Monophysitism. However,<br />
references to both Justins and to Marcian come at the end of the Kebra<br />
Nagast in the same section as the fourteenth century monarch Amda Seyon.<br />
In addition, the references to Marcian and other issues are inaccurate, so it<br />
is probable that the whole of this late section was written in the early 1300s<br />
not in the 500s as is the rest of the Caleb Cycle. The Caleb Cycle speaks of<br />
the emperor Marcian as being vanquished by the Persians. The writer<br />
seems to have confused Marcian, who suffered no such fate, with a later<br />
ruler. During and after the Himyarite War the Byzantines were in frequent<br />
diplomatic contact with Aksum, but it seems the authors of the Kebra<br />
Nagast did not have access to pertinent records. The Caleb Cycle states<br />
Justin I and Caleb met before launching their campaigns against the Jewish<br />
movements in Armenia and in Himyar. Such a meeting never took place,<br />
and Justin’s name may have been confused with Julian, an envoy whom the<br />
Emperor Justinian (A.D. 527–565) dispatched to Aksum. The Caleb Cycle<br />
also confuses Justin’s Armenian campaign with the Persian campaign<br />
against the Jewish state of Mahoza. It is Mahoza that was linked to Yusuf’s<br />
rising in Himyar/Yemen. Justin’s campaign was in the region of modern<br />
Armenia and Georgia, where there were demographically insignificant<br />
isolated Jewish groups, including blacksmiths of African descent in Colchis,<br />
whose ancestors, according to Herodotus, had been exiled by the Assyrians.<br />
These Jewish groups do not seem to have led a major rebellion against the<br />
Byzantines. The confusion between Justin’s campaign and the Persian<br />
campaign must have been partly due to references to “Armenia,” whose<br />
boundaries once included much of modern Turkey and Iraq. Lastly, the<br />
Caleb Cycle only briefly refers to Caleb’s crusade against Jewish Himyar,<br />
although other highly detailed Monophysite accounts in Syriac exist. All<br />
this evidence points to the bulk of the Caleb Cycle being written at the