Sheba
Sheba
Sheba
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
QUEEN OF SHEBA AND BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP 183<br />
Shelemay, an ethnomusicologist whose work on the Beta Israel has<br />
been highly praised, published her findings in 1989. 9 She makes no<br />
mention of the br inscriptions on the Tigre plateau let alone the important<br />
new trends in Old Testament archaeology. Worse, when she was later<br />
informed of these findings in 2006, she declined to receive details. She<br />
accepts the late Maxime Rodinson’s conclusion that neither the Israelite<br />
religion nor Judaism made any significant impact in southern Arabia until<br />
around A.D. 395. She dismisses the <strong>Sheba</strong>-Menelik Cycle as a myth and<br />
often judges Beta Israel practices by comparing them with “normative<br />
Judaism”, which is of little relevance since all Ethiopian traditions maintain<br />
that their past is Israelite not Judaic, and long predates Ezra’s fifth-century<br />
B.C.E. reforms. Shelemay’s work is thorough, and no one can seriously<br />
doubt her conclusion that the Beta Israel musical tradition comes from an<br />
Orthodox Christian source but, given the antiquity of their relationship, this<br />
would be expected. Shelemay is an ethnomusicologist making historical<br />
judgments and is unable to move outside the mental constraints of her<br />
Zionist beliefs. Nevertheless, given the growing doubt concerning Biblical<br />
archaeology and the need to find a plausible theory to explain Arabian<br />
Judaism, it might have been expected that Shelemay would have been<br />
alerted to the possibility that Beta Israel traditions deserved reassessment.<br />
Consequently, her final sentence - “It is difficult to dispute what we find,<br />
since one cannot argue with a song” - can only apply to the relationship<br />
between Orthodox and Beta Israel music and only fractionally to their<br />
historical past.<br />
Quiran and Kaplan both published in 1992, 10 the same year as<br />
Thompson’s survey of Israelite archaeology. Neither of them mentions the<br />
disquiet in Old Testament archaeological circles nor Professor Ali Mazrui’s<br />
consideration that Salibi’s hypothesis could shed considerable light on the<br />
origins of Israelite influences in Ethiopia. Kaplan concludes that Aksum<br />
was influenced by southern Arabian Judaic elements between the second<br />
and third centuries A.D. Quiran suggests they may have come from a<br />
Judaic-Christian background. They and Shelemay emphasize that the word<br />
Ayhud, meaning Jew, was often used to denigrate those who did not fully<br />
accept the tenets of the Orthodox Church, which, after 1270, became<br />
increasingly entwined with the imperial monarchy. Quiran argues that<br />
while Jews or Judaic-Christians may have been active at the court of<br />
Aksum before Frumentius’s arrival, the Beta Israel are not their<br />
descendants. Quiran and Kaplan both postulate that marginalized elements<br />
in Ethiopian society chose to oppose assimilation into the imperial