27.10.2014 Views

Sheba

Sheba

Sheba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUEEN OF SHEBA AND BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP 183<br />

Shelemay, an ethnomusicologist whose work on the Beta Israel has<br />

been highly praised, published her findings in 1989. 9 She makes no<br />

mention of the br inscriptions on the Tigre plateau let alone the important<br />

new trends in Old Testament archaeology. Worse, when she was later<br />

informed of these findings in 2006, she declined to receive details. She<br />

accepts the late Maxime Rodinson’s conclusion that neither the Israelite<br />

religion nor Judaism made any significant impact in southern Arabia until<br />

around A.D. 395. She dismisses the <strong>Sheba</strong>-Menelik Cycle as a myth and<br />

often judges Beta Israel practices by comparing them with “normative<br />

Judaism”, which is of little relevance since all Ethiopian traditions maintain<br />

that their past is Israelite not Judaic, and long predates Ezra’s fifth-century<br />

B.C.E. reforms. Shelemay’s work is thorough, and no one can seriously<br />

doubt her conclusion that the Beta Israel musical tradition comes from an<br />

Orthodox Christian source but, given the antiquity of their relationship, this<br />

would be expected. Shelemay is an ethnomusicologist making historical<br />

judgments and is unable to move outside the mental constraints of her<br />

Zionist beliefs. Nevertheless, given the growing doubt concerning Biblical<br />

archaeology and the need to find a plausible theory to explain Arabian<br />

Judaism, it might have been expected that Shelemay would have been<br />

alerted to the possibility that Beta Israel traditions deserved reassessment.<br />

Consequently, her final sentence - “It is difficult to dispute what we find,<br />

since one cannot argue with a song” - can only apply to the relationship<br />

between Orthodox and Beta Israel music and only fractionally to their<br />

historical past.<br />

Quiran and Kaplan both published in 1992, 10 the same year as<br />

Thompson’s survey of Israelite archaeology. Neither of them mentions the<br />

disquiet in Old Testament archaeological circles nor Professor Ali Mazrui’s<br />

consideration that Salibi’s hypothesis could shed considerable light on the<br />

origins of Israelite influences in Ethiopia. Kaplan concludes that Aksum<br />

was influenced by southern Arabian Judaic elements between the second<br />

and third centuries A.D. Quiran suggests they may have come from a<br />

Judaic-Christian background. They and Shelemay emphasize that the word<br />

Ayhud, meaning Jew, was often used to denigrate those who did not fully<br />

accept the tenets of the Orthodox Church, which, after 1270, became<br />

increasingly entwined with the imperial monarchy. Quiran argues that<br />

while Jews or Judaic-Christians may have been active at the court of<br />

Aksum before Frumentius’s arrival, the Beta Israel are not their<br />

descendants. Quiran and Kaplan both postulate that marginalized elements<br />

in Ethiopian society chose to oppose assimilation into the imperial

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!