27.10.2014 Views

Sheba

Sheba

Sheba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUEEN OF SHEBA AND BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP 149<br />

No such debate has eventuated. Despite this, commentators have continued<br />

to debate Salibi’s ideas, mostly on the Internet. Chris Khoury, writing on<br />

February 25, 2003, aptly summarized the situation:<br />

Upon scouring whatever journals I could for book reviews and<br />

commentary on Salibi’s work, I found much ridicule, scorn, and<br />

disregard but virtually no substantive criticism.<br />

The same year the University of Arizona’s William Dever, Professor of<br />

Near Eastern Archaeology, published his Who Were the Early Israelites and<br />

Where Did They Come From? in which he dismissed Salibi’s work as,<br />

“a notorious book ... thoroughly discredited, of course, by critics on all<br />

sides.” 9<br />

During his career Dever received over US $1,300,000 in grants to dig at<br />

sites believed to be from ancient Israel, in particular Gezer, and served as<br />

director of the Albright Institute (1971-75). He had vast experience in<br />

academic editorial, lecturing, supervisory, and research work, and<br />

publishing, yet the word Arabia does not appear once in his eighteen page<br />

résumé. He and others with deep but exceedingly narrow experience are in<br />

no position to judge research on subjects in which they have never<br />

professed any interest and of which they are profoundly ignorant. Any<br />

scholar with an elementary knowledge of Arabian Judaism would have<br />

responded in a more academically professional manner to Salibi’s ideas.<br />

Salibi elaborated on his ideas in three later books: Secrets of the Bible<br />

People (1988), Conspiracy in Jerusalem: the Hidden Origins of Jesus<br />

(1988), and The Historicity of Biblical Israel (1998). He placed the<br />

development of the early Israelite religion in the “ring of fire” volcanic<br />

region of Yemen and the Egyptian captivity not in Egypt itself but in an<br />

Egyptian colony in Arabia, in either the Asir or Jizan regions in the south.<br />

The beginning of the Hebrew captivity has been assigned to either ca.<br />

1800 or ca. 1600 B.C.E. The Egyptian Middle Kingdom rulers<br />

Amenemhet I (ca. 1938-1908 B.C.E.) and his son, co-regent and later<br />

monarch, Sesostris (ca. 1918-1985 B.C.E.) re-established the capital at<br />

Thebes. From there they annexed the south as far as the Second Cataract<br />

and perhaps had some involvement in their Asian borderland. Speculation<br />

spurred by biblical interest points to Palestine, but economic logic suggests<br />

it is more likely that the Egyptians were more focused on controlling the<br />

Hijaz trade routes to ensure luxury goods were channeled towards the Red

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!