27.10.2014 Views

Sheba

Sheba

Sheba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUEEN OF SHEBA AND BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP 11<br />

alone, control of trade routes being a bonus. Others, like Judah, had a<br />

disproportionate reliance on controlling trade routes. One highlight of<br />

Solomon’s reign was the state visit of the Queen of <strong>Sheba</strong>, ruler of southern<br />

Arabia. The Old Testament interprets this visit as formalizing trade<br />

relations. Traditions say that Solomon annexed Taima in northern Arabia.<br />

If so, it would have brought control of trade from the Arabian Gulf.<br />

Some commentators believe that after the division of the kingdom<br />

Israel prospered while Judah went into economic decline. The reason given<br />

is that, unlike Judah, Israel continued to control lucrative trade routes. Omri,<br />

king of Israel (885-874 B.C.E.), built a new capital at Samaria that eclipsed<br />

the splendor of Jerusalem.<br />

Considering the political climate, the history of the trade routes, and<br />

the location of Samaria, none of this seems right. It is difficult to reconcile<br />

the changed circumstances with Israel’s new prosperity. Prosperity under<br />

Solomon had most probably come from taxing the wealth of the <strong>Sheba</strong>n<br />

and Taima trade routes. The people of the northern areas resented the tax<br />

and the enforced labor, and broke away. Yet after the split it was Israel in<br />

the north that prospered, although it is difficult to believe how Israel could<br />

do so with Judah standing between it and the Taima-<strong>Sheba</strong>n trade routes.<br />

Moreover, Israel lacked a port, and the Egyptian trade from the Levant was<br />

seaborne from Phoenicia to the Nile Delta. A second point concerns the<br />

early period of the Hebrew’s Egyptian captivity.<br />

There was one important aberration to this pattern of establishing Iron<br />

Age states – Egypt. Pharaoh Ramses III (ca. 1187-66 B.C.E.) spent the first<br />

years of his reign dealing with the southern expansion into Syria of the<br />

Hittites, an Indo-European people whose empire was centered in modernday<br />

Turkey. The Hittite empire then suddenly collapsed; the blame<br />

generally apportioned to massive attacks by the above mentioned Sea<br />

Peoples, aggressive groups from different parts of the eastern<br />

Mediterranean. These Sea People moved against Egypt itself but were<br />

defeated in two battles, one on land and the other at sea. They retreated and<br />

sailed westward, probably settling in Sardinia, Sicily, or Tuscany (Etruria).<br />

Ramses III’s victory had an interesting consequence, for it spared Egypt the<br />

political upheaval of Iron Age conquest and massive technological change.<br />

But it also raises a serious concern. Egypt was not yet an Iron Age smelting<br />

country in 1166 B.C.E., yet biblical scholarship supports the notion that the<br />

Hebrew who fled Egypt in the Exodus, 100 to 300 years earlier, already<br />

practiced iron smelting, which provided them with weapons that enabled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!