Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University
Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University
Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Words & Reflections<br />
ness has weakened news operations.<br />
More importantly, in many instances,<br />
quality of content and civic concern<br />
are sacrificed in the quest for high<br />
profit margins. But as this book points<br />
out, places still exist in large and small<br />
communities where there are opportunities<br />
to practice quality journalism.<br />
And the authors document how topnotch<br />
news operations can also be good<br />
for the company’s bottom line.<br />
The arguments presented in “The<br />
News About the News” aren’t idealistic.<br />
After all, the authors work for a<br />
news organization that places great<br />
emphasis on strong economic performance.<br />
And they aren’t naive. Throughout<br />
the book, Downie and Kaiser acknowledge<br />
that “journalism won’t exist<br />
without financial support—someone<br />
has to pay the journalists and the expenses<br />
of gathering news.” They also<br />
make the point, by offering strong examples<br />
and frank testimony, that the<br />
evolving “show Wall Street the money”<br />
attitude of corporate owners has altered<br />
the jobs (and outlook) of people<br />
most responsible for the quality of journalism<br />
in news organizations. Instead<br />
of the laser-like focus on tough, accurate<br />
reporting and good writing, newsroom<br />
leaders are forced to divert their<br />
attention to financial considerations.<br />
“Newspaper editors and television<br />
news directors … have been held more<br />
accountable for controlling costs and<br />
increasing profits than for improving<br />
the quality of their journalism,” Downie<br />
and Kaiser observe. They point particularly<br />
to newspaper chains Knight<br />
Ridder and Gannett and to corporations<br />
that own networks and local stations<br />
such as General Electric and<br />
Disney.<br />
The authors try to be optimistic<br />
about the future of newspapers and<br />
the Internet as places where good journalism<br />
can flourish. They also look<br />
with a hopeful eye at the prospects for<br />
broadcast journalism but, in this attempt,<br />
they aren’t as convincing. (Perhaps<br />
this is because the authors have<br />
made their careers in newspapers.)<br />
Take this example from their look at<br />
broadcast news: “Heather Nauert had<br />
only her blond, youthful good looks<br />
and a sincere desire to become a television<br />
star when she joined the world<br />
Instead of the laser-like focus on tough,<br />
accurate reporting and good writing,<br />
newsroom leaders are forced to divert their<br />
attention to financial considerations.<br />
original and more effective ways. These<br />
aspects of the role of new media receive<br />
thorough examination. But the<br />
authors fail to discuss another area in<br />
which the Internet is having a critical<br />
impact on journalism by changing the<br />
ways in which reporters find information,<br />
reach sources, and report the<br />
news. Questions about this are left<br />
unaddressed. It would have been good<br />
to hear the authors’ views on whether<br />
easier and increased access to information<br />
through technology (no matter<br />
where the journalist might be) is making<br />
news coverage more competitive,<br />
accurate and complete. Or whether it<br />
gives reporters the ability to present<br />
broader perspectives. Perhaps such<br />
topics can be covered in a future edition.<br />
Kaiser and Downie make a strong<br />
effort to highlight examples of best<br />
practices. These illustrate how quality<br />
news can flourish. And in doing this,<br />
they don’t restrict themselves to large<br />
metropolitan and national papers. At<br />
times, however, the book seems to<br />
become almost too clinical in its examination.<br />
What is missing are examples<br />
of the passion that people contribute<br />
to creating great news<br />
organizations, large and small, an attribute<br />
the authors know good journalism<br />
requires. Finding that passion,<br />
providing an environment where it is<br />
appropriately focused and nurtured,<br />
might be critical ingredients in keeping<br />
newspapers, news magazines,<br />
broadcast news outlets, and evolving<br />
Internet news operations economically<br />
strong and vital contributors to our<br />
civic strength in the 21st century. ■<br />
of talkers on the Fox News Channel,”<br />
they write. “… What were the thirtyyear-old’s<br />
qualifications? ‘When I first<br />
saw her I thought Heather was our<br />
demographic, that she could bring in<br />
younger people,’ Fox News executive<br />
producer Bill Skine said. ‘When you<br />
have a pundit who is young, and knows<br />
what they’re talking about, they exude<br />
more energy.’”<br />
The Internet is emerging as a place<br />
where people can find news. And it is<br />
also a place where media organizations<br />
are looking to present news in<br />
Seth Effron, a 1992 <strong>Nieman</strong> Fellow,<br />
is special projects director at the<br />
<strong>Nieman</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong>.<br />
effron@fas.harvard.edu<br />
94 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Winter 2002