30.10.2014 Views

Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University

Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University

Download issue (PDF) - Nieman Foundation - Harvard University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Words & Reflections<br />

ness has weakened news operations.<br />

More importantly, in many instances,<br />

quality of content and civic concern<br />

are sacrificed in the quest for high<br />

profit margins. But as this book points<br />

out, places still exist in large and small<br />

communities where there are opportunities<br />

to practice quality journalism.<br />

And the authors document how topnotch<br />

news operations can also be good<br />

for the company’s bottom line.<br />

The arguments presented in “The<br />

News About the News” aren’t idealistic.<br />

After all, the authors work for a<br />

news organization that places great<br />

emphasis on strong economic performance.<br />

And they aren’t naive. Throughout<br />

the book, Downie and Kaiser acknowledge<br />

that “journalism won’t exist<br />

without financial support—someone<br />

has to pay the journalists and the expenses<br />

of gathering news.” They also<br />

make the point, by offering strong examples<br />

and frank testimony, that the<br />

evolving “show Wall Street the money”<br />

attitude of corporate owners has altered<br />

the jobs (and outlook) of people<br />

most responsible for the quality of journalism<br />

in news organizations. Instead<br />

of the laser-like focus on tough, accurate<br />

reporting and good writing, newsroom<br />

leaders are forced to divert their<br />

attention to financial considerations.<br />

“Newspaper editors and television<br />

news directors … have been held more<br />

accountable for controlling costs and<br />

increasing profits than for improving<br />

the quality of their journalism,” Downie<br />

and Kaiser observe. They point particularly<br />

to newspaper chains Knight<br />

Ridder and Gannett and to corporations<br />

that own networks and local stations<br />

such as General Electric and<br />

Disney.<br />

The authors try to be optimistic<br />

about the future of newspapers and<br />

the Internet as places where good journalism<br />

can flourish. They also look<br />

with a hopeful eye at the prospects for<br />

broadcast journalism but, in this attempt,<br />

they aren’t as convincing. (Perhaps<br />

this is because the authors have<br />

made their careers in newspapers.)<br />

Take this example from their look at<br />

broadcast news: “Heather Nauert had<br />

only her blond, youthful good looks<br />

and a sincere desire to become a television<br />

star when she joined the world<br />

Instead of the laser-like focus on tough,<br />

accurate reporting and good writing,<br />

newsroom leaders are forced to divert their<br />

attention to financial considerations.<br />

original and more effective ways. These<br />

aspects of the role of new media receive<br />

thorough examination. But the<br />

authors fail to discuss another area in<br />

which the Internet is having a critical<br />

impact on journalism by changing the<br />

ways in which reporters find information,<br />

reach sources, and report the<br />

news. Questions about this are left<br />

unaddressed. It would have been good<br />

to hear the authors’ views on whether<br />

easier and increased access to information<br />

through technology (no matter<br />

where the journalist might be) is making<br />

news coverage more competitive,<br />

accurate and complete. Or whether it<br />

gives reporters the ability to present<br />

broader perspectives. Perhaps such<br />

topics can be covered in a future edition.<br />

Kaiser and Downie make a strong<br />

effort to highlight examples of best<br />

practices. These illustrate how quality<br />

news can flourish. And in doing this,<br />

they don’t restrict themselves to large<br />

metropolitan and national papers. At<br />

times, however, the book seems to<br />

become almost too clinical in its examination.<br />

What is missing are examples<br />

of the passion that people contribute<br />

to creating great news<br />

organizations, large and small, an attribute<br />

the authors know good journalism<br />

requires. Finding that passion,<br />

providing an environment where it is<br />

appropriately focused and nurtured,<br />

might be critical ingredients in keeping<br />

newspapers, news magazines,<br />

broadcast news outlets, and evolving<br />

Internet news operations economically<br />

strong and vital contributors to our<br />

civic strength in the 21st century. ■<br />

of talkers on the Fox News Channel,”<br />

they write. “… What were the thirtyyear-old’s<br />

qualifications? ‘When I first<br />

saw her I thought Heather was our<br />

demographic, that she could bring in<br />

younger people,’ Fox News executive<br />

producer Bill Skine said. ‘When you<br />

have a pundit who is young, and knows<br />

what they’re talking about, they exude<br />

more energy.’”<br />

The Internet is emerging as a place<br />

where people can find news. And it is<br />

also a place where media organizations<br />

are looking to present news in<br />

Seth Effron, a 1992 <strong>Nieman</strong> Fellow,<br />

is special projects director at the<br />

<strong>Nieman</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong>.<br />

effron@fas.harvard.edu<br />

94 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Winter 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!