03.11.2014 Views

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix<br />

C Key Issues and Options – Water Quality<br />

Option 38.<br />

Require septic system inspections on a periodic<br />

basis<br />

Inspection of septic systems is important to ensure that systems are<br />

properly operating. Periodic inspection can also reveal early warning signs<br />

of a failing system. Periodic inspection of septic systems is mandatory and<br />

is written into both state code (WAC Chapter 246-272 On-Site Sewage<br />

Systems) and county code (Jefferson <strong>County</strong> Code, Chapter 8.15 On-Site<br />

Sewage Disposal Systems). In fact, a July, 2005 update to WAC 246-272<br />

requires septic system owners to perform a complete inspection of their<br />

systems every three years (as opposed to just the solids), and certain systems<br />

will be required to perform annual inspections (WAC 246-272A). Even<br />

when inspection is mandatory, however, enforcing inspection requirements<br />

can be a significant challenge. Local health departments could develop new<br />

procedures or requirements for regular septic inspections to be carried out<br />

by county health departments, private companies, or individual homeowners<br />

through “do-it-yourself” inspections. Agencies should include<br />

these new monitoring procedures or requirements in their required onsite<br />

sewage plans as specified under WAC 246-272A.<br />

Option 39.<br />

Develop financial and other incentives to<br />

encourage septic system inspection,<br />

maintenance, replacement, and upgrades<br />

Inspection, maintenance, and needed replacements or upgrades are essential<br />

to ensure proper septic system operation and avoid water-quality impacts.<br />

Option 38 described mandatory inspections, but an alternate or<br />

supplementary approach could be to develop financial or other forms of<br />

incentives. Potential incentives could include low-interest loan programs<br />

for homeowners who discover failing systems. Another approach could<br />

include providing benefits to buyers who purchase homes with upgraded<br />

septic systems or who agree to upgrade existing systems. A similar<br />

approach is used to encourage energy efficiency through the Energy<br />

Efficient Mortgage, a program to benefit homeowners who purchase or sell<br />

energy efficient homes. Funding for various incentive programs could<br />

perhaps be supported by federal and state sources including the Non-Point<br />

Source Implementation Grant (319) Program, State Revolving Loan Fund,<br />

or the National Decentralized Water Resource Capacity Development<br />

Project (EPA, 2005). Finally, there may be some opportunity to expand the<br />

use of stand funds for septic improvements and best management practices<br />

on private lands, a practice that is currently limited by WAC 173-95A.<br />

Option 40.<br />

Develop and implement a public outreach and<br />

education campaign concerning fecal coliform<br />

For the public to be an active partner in improving water quality, they must<br />

understand the sources of – and strategies to prevent – water pollution.<br />

Therefore, an education and outreach campaign about activities that can<br />

page 114 Final <strong>Plan</strong> for <strong>County</strong> Adoption – May 11, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!