03.11.2014 Views

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix<br />

F Options for Funding New Efforts<br />

• US Environmental Protection Agency, Catalog of Federal Funding<br />

Sources for <strong>Watershed</strong> Protection, http://cfpub.epa.gov/fedfund/<br />

• US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Finance<br />

Program, http://www.epa.gov/efinpage/<br />

• Boise State University, Environmental Finance Center,<br />

http://sspa.boisestate.edu/efc/ and funding database<br />

http://efc.boisestate.edu/searchmenu.asp.<br />

• Puget Sound Action Team, Funding Programs,<br />

http://www.psat.wa.gov/Programs/Funding.htm<br />

Revenue from Special Districts or Utilities<br />

Following are some examples of how special districts and utilities could be<br />

used to raise and administer funds for watershed protection.<br />

Option 95.<br />

Establish a surface water management district or<br />

utility<br />

A surface water management district or utility would provide a mechanism<br />

for assessing fees and managing surface water in unincorporated areas of<br />

<strong>Mason</strong> and Jefferson Counties. Districts or utilities that focus on surface<br />

and storm waters can be created or fee-raising power under a variety of laws<br />

in Washington, including RCW 36.89, RCW 36.94, RCW 57, and RCW 85.<br />

They are relatively common in western Washington, especially in growing<br />

counties such as Skagit, Snohomish, King, Pierce, Thurston, and Clark.<br />

Currently, Jefferson <strong>County</strong> has one SWMD, in the North Bay area of Port<br />

Ludlow. The City of Port Townsend also collects a utilities fee for<br />

stormwater management. Kitsap <strong>County</strong> has also established a district, an<br />

action that some believe will help to proactively manage—or even<br />

prevent—the types of water quality impacts seen in urban counties. One<br />

option for counties is RCW 36.94.020, which authorizes counties to<br />

implement comprehensive water resources programs under a single utility<br />

(e.g., activities related to diking, flooding, stormwater, sewerage, lakes, and<br />

shellfish).<br />

Surface water management districts and utilities typically raise funds by<br />

assessing fees on properties—residential, commercial, government, and, in<br />

some cases, agricultural—based on impervious surface coverage. For<br />

residential parcels, a standard fee is typically applied based on the average<br />

impervious surface of all residential parcels in the district. Fees for<br />

commercial properties are based on multiples of the residential fee. Fees<br />

are typically collected with property tax billings. In WRIAs 16, the funds<br />

generated could be used to collect and manage data, monitor water quality,<br />

provide support for technical and educational programs, and implement<br />

many other activities.<br />

page 150 Final <strong>Plan</strong> for <strong>County</strong> Adoption – May 11, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!