03.11.2014 Views

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

Watershed Management Plan - Mason County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix<br />

C Key Issues and Options – Water Quality<br />

for maintenance of roadside ditches, including regular inspections and<br />

cleaning, planting of vegetation, and examination of culverts for evidence of<br />

scour. The manual also recommends – but does not require – that<br />

jurisdictions install bioswales and filter strips to treat runoff from roads,<br />

and to use engineered topsoils when needed to establish and maintain<br />

roadside vegetation. Bioswales are ditches ranging from two to ten feet in<br />

width that use plants and topsoil to filter pollutants from stormwater. A<br />

filter strip is a flat area that performs the same functions as a bioswale.<br />

Filter strips consist of a narrow band of gravel that borders a roadway and a<br />

wider swath of vegetation adjacent to the gravel (Washington Department<br />

of Ecology, 2001).<br />

The <strong>Plan</strong>ning Unit could request that the Washington Department of<br />

Transportation implement these recommended best management practices<br />

for treating stormwater runoff from highways, particularly when highway<br />

repairs are conducted.<br />

Option 51.<br />

Adopt the most current Stormwater <strong>Management</strong><br />

Manual for Western Washington or equivalent<br />

manual<br />

The Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team’s Puget Sound Water Quality<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (2000) calls for cities and counties to adopt a stormwater<br />

management manual to guide their water quality efforts. Specifically, the<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> encourages local governments to adopt the Department of<br />

Ecology’s Stormwater <strong>Management</strong> Manual for Western Washington. The most<br />

recent version of the manual was released in early 2005 (Washington<br />

Department of Ecology, 2005b).<br />

Should a local government opt not to adopt Ecology’s manual, the<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> recommends adopting an “equivalent” manual (Puget<br />

Sound Water Quality Action Team, 2000). Jurisdictions must submit their<br />

chosen manuals to Ecology for review and approval. Other manuals<br />

developed in Washington State include the 2005 King <strong>County</strong> Surface Water<br />

Design Manual (King <strong>County</strong> Water and Land Resources Division, 2005),<br />

and the Stormwater Manual for Eastern Washington, published in 2004<br />

(Washington Department of Ecology, 2005c). Although King <strong>County</strong> is<br />

more urbanized than <strong>Mason</strong> and Jefferson Counties, significant portions of<br />

the county are still rural, with agriculture and forestry as primary land uses.<br />

Therefore, the King <strong>County</strong> manual may be useful in WRIA 16. The<br />

Eastern Washington manual likely is not appropriate for WRIA 16 because<br />

of climatic differences.<br />

The US EPA’s national best management practices for NPDES Stormwater<br />

Phase II can be downloaded from their website 14 . However, the EPA<br />

intends that these best management practices serve as guidance for local<br />

14 http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/bmp_files.cfm<br />

page 120 Final <strong>Plan</strong> for <strong>County</strong> Adoption – May 11, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!