Abstracts, XIV OPTIMA Meeting, Palermo (Italy) , 9-15
Abstracts, XIV OPTIMA Meeting, Palermo (Italy) , 9-15
Abstracts, XIV OPTIMA Meeting, Palermo (Italy) , 9-15
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>XIV</strong> <strong>OPTIMA</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong>, <strong>Palermo</strong> (<strong>Italy</strong>), 9-<strong>15</strong> September 2013<br />
The use of available collection data for taxonomy and systematics<br />
KNAPP S.<br />
Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom. E-mail: s.knapp@nhm.ac.uk<br />
Collection data form the basis for all hypotheses in taxonomy (and its synonym systematics).<br />
Collections are the evidence upon which scientists base hypotheses of species circumscription, species<br />
distribution, phylogenetic relatedness and conservation threat. But what are collections? How useful<br />
are the specimens we hold in our cabinets in today’s world or e-interconnection and mass data analysis,<br />
particularly of molecular data? The commonly held view in our own community is that collections<br />
are critical for the rest of the biological enterprise, as is the work of taxonomists. But what kinds of<br />
collections do we need to do 21 st century taxonomy? I will explore some alternatives to traditional collections,<br />
and both problems in the integration of new and old collections for taxonomy and systematics<br />
and the meaning of available – just what does it mean to be available? Licensing and re-use of data<br />
is fast becoming an issue for both institutions and individuals – how available do things need to be to<br />
be scientifically useful? I will argue that indeed, collections are critical, but that we might need to<br />
rethink just what they really are.<br />
65