10.11.2014 Views

GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF GEOLOGICAL MATERIALS

GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF GEOLOGICAL MATERIALS

GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF GEOLOGICAL MATERIALS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACQUISITION<br />

PREAMBLE<br />

In this Part we discuss the methods and systems by which material is gained for<br />

the collections; the means of documenting that material is covered in Part B.<br />

GENERAL PRINCIPLES<br />

In these Guidelines acquisition is defined as:<br />

the process by which material is added to collections within a curator's care.<br />

Acquired material will become catalogued and hence a 'permanent' part of a<br />

museum's collections. What follows, however, in terms of the care a curator must<br />

provide for specimens, extends also to material for which he may only have<br />

temporary responsibility, such as loans to the museum. In the next Part, in which<br />

the processes of documentation are discussed, the term 'Entry' is used for.<br />

anything coming into the museum on either a permanent or temporary basis; the<br />

term 'Acquisition' is restricted in Part E to the more legal aspects of accepting<br />

material permanently into the museum. Here, we are concerned with how<br />

material for use in the museum and added to its collections is acquired.<br />

The process of acquisition is at the 'sharp end' of curation in as much as all<br />

other curatorial activities will, to some extent, flow from this activity. This can be<br />

summed up as:<br />

'What you acquire dictates what you do.'<br />

It is important for the curator to recognise the implications of such an axiom,<br />

since it can put the curatorial cart before the horse. The often randomly acquired<br />

collections of the past, which are a fact of every curator's life, will inevitably<br />

continue to influence curatorial activity. If, however, the curator gives considered<br />

direction to his present acquisitive behaviour, his (and his successors') subsequent<br />

curatorial activities will also have direction. To take control of the reins, today's<br />

curator, displaying professionalism, has created an alternative axiom:<br />

'What you want to do must dictate what you acquire.'<br />

It is this notion which underlies the generally accepted view that every<br />

professionally-run museum should have a published statement of its aims and<br />

activities, of which an acquisition policy is an integral part. The first guideline of<br />

the Museums Association's 'Code of Conduct for Museum Curators' (Duggan et<br />

al. 1984) states that:<br />

"An appropriate and detailed acquisition policy is recognised as essential to<br />

the orderly management of a museum. It implies the acceptance of<br />

responsibility for the curation and physical accommodation of collections as<br />

defined in the policy for as long as they are held."<br />

The acquisition of an object - however acquired - represents a commitment of<br />

resources which has to be justifiable. It is no longer professionally defensible for a<br />

curator to accept, say, a donation, if neither the object nor its associations are<br />

remotely relevant to the activities of his institution.<br />

The acquisition policy should state the broad subject areas in which the<br />

museum will acquire material. It should also discourage the acquisition of<br />

material where the act of acquisition may conflict with the interests of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!