10.11.2014 Views

GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF GEOLOGICAL MATERIALS

GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF GEOLOGICAL MATERIALS

GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF GEOLOGICAL MATERIALS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Of immediate concern is the question: which pieces of ,documentary evidence<br />

should be specifically referred to in the catalogue entry, and which should be<br />

merely available as background information, perhaps in the History File (see<br />

B4.4.7.3)? Palmer (1977) refers to the latter as 'stored data', recognising both the<br />

dangers and impracticality of storing all relevant data with a specimen. The<br />

importance of any stored data is the measure by which a curator determines<br />

whether or not it is mentioned in the catalogue entry or indeed written on a label<br />

with the specimen. It is difficult, therefore to recommend which particular kind of<br />

documentary supporting evidence should be directly referred to. In general,<br />

however, there are two significant classes of document:<br />

m a document used in the production of a record,<br />

e.g. field note book <br />

old catalogue listing <br />

examination label <br />

m any published document specifically referring to an object, particularly fossils<br />

with a taxonomic status.<br />

Both these classes should be recorded in the catalogue, using standard bibliographic<br />

conventions whenever possible. It should be made clear in what way a<br />

document referred to in such a record relates to the specimen. The MDA<br />

Geology Specimen Card achieves this by the use of code letters L (link), D<br />

(document) and H (history); see the MDA 1980 Instructions for details. The<br />

documents concerned should have their relevant parts copied and placed in the<br />

History File, or, where this is impossible, their location recorded.<br />

4.4.7.2. Cross references<br />

In addition to bibliographic references, others may be required which link<br />

specimens with records kept in other filing systems. The MDA distinguishes<br />

between two kinds of cross-reference.<br />

Explicit references are those which correspond to information held under a<br />

special number, e.g. a site file number in a geological locality record centre. Such<br />

references should always be recorded in the catalogue entry. Implicit references<br />

are those corresponding to information held under numbers or headings already<br />

given in the catalogue (e.g. Specimen Identity Number for History Files, donor's<br />

name for Collection Files, etc.). Implicit references need not necessarily be<br />

specifically recorded; their existence is implied.<br />

4.4.7.3. Specimens historyfiles (see Fig. 6)<br />

It is frequently the case that item recording about a specimen will result in the<br />

accumulation of an archive both during and after the processing of that specimen<br />

into a museum collection: detailed conservation records, photographs, correspondence,<br />

etc. -may of those items to which only brief reference might be made in<br />

the catalogue. This archive is difficult and time-consuming to use if split between<br />

the various filing systems of a museum, conservation department files, correspondence<br />

files, etc. History Files are large envelopes or wallets designed to contain<br />

all the two-dimensional material or copies of it, relevant to individual specimens.<br />

Each envelope should be marked with the Specimen Identity Number, specimen<br />

name, collection name, date of file opening and name of responsible curator. Any

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!