ANALYSIS OF FOOD CONSUMPTION DATA IN THE ... - NSCB

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Discussion 1. “all income group” vs. “bottom 30% income group” - The food basket of the “all income group” is more diverse, resulting to higher food cost / inflated food threshold, than that of the “bottom 30% income group.” - The estimates of food poor tend to be inflated when food threshold is derived from the food basket of the “all income group” compared to “bottom 30% income group” - 92% higher for incidence of urban food poor, 43% higher for incidence of rural food poor, 77% higher for the overall incidence of food poverty.
2. Food basket vs. actual foods consumed (unadjusted) - food baskets or lumping of food items into groups vs. actual foods consumed (unadjusted “food basket”) tends to lower the validity (sensitivity and specificity) of food poverty estimates
Page 1 and 2: ANALYSIS OF FOOD CONSUMPTION DATA I
Page 3 and 4: GENERAL OBJECTIVE: To compare the f
Page 5 and 6: METHOD 1. Data cleaning, which incl
Page 7 and 8: METHOD 4. Stepwise logistic regress
Page 10 and 11: Daily per capita food basket derive
Page 12 and 13: Daily per capita food basket derive
Page 14 and 15: Food thresholds derived from “all
Page 16 and 17: Incidence of food poverty based on
Page 18 and 19: Sensitivity and specificity of esti
Page 22: 3. Arguments for the nutrition stan

ANALYSIS OF FOOD CONSUMPTION DATA IN THE ... - NSCB

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?