11.11.2014 Views

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Symmetrically</strong> <strong>Designed</strong> <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong>: A <strong>Quantitative</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> : 181<br />

solution. He suggests 16 that the Gemara in Kiddushin is dealing not with<br />

words but rather with pairs of words. He proceeds to list 89 places in<br />

דרש דרש the <strong>Torah</strong> where double words are employed and shows that<br />

is the 45 th pair. 17 As with his solution with the letters, many have<br />

challenged this answer 18 by showing that any list of double letters is<br />

arbitrary, 19 e.g. R’ Zilber himself first counted 77 pairs and then 85<br />

pairs before settling on 89. And, as in the previous section, we once<br />

again raise the question as to why anyone would be interested in<br />

making such a list and finding the center of it. Merzbach tries to<br />

address this question by offering the following rationale for R’<br />

Zilber’s general approach:<br />

“We have to remember that the purpose of the soferim in the<br />

different counts of letters, words, verses and parashiot was to<br />

preserve the uniformity and precision of the Written <strong>Torah</strong>. They<br />

wanted to give all the holders of <strong>Torah</strong> scrolls simple testing<br />

methods that would enable them to check that nothing was<br />

omitted or added to the <strong>Torah</strong> scrolls that they hold. It is not<br />

practical to ask a person to count 80,000 words, so they suggested<br />

much simpler checks, though they are less certain.”<br />

Considering: the length of the <strong>Torah</strong> and the type of errors<br />

that can occur, the fact that the <strong>Torah</strong> is usable even if the “odd”<br />

letters are written normally; 20 and that the double-word test is by no<br />

means that easy to apply and of very limited usefulness, we find this<br />

justification of R’ Zilber’s approach unconvincing. 21<br />

אהבת תורה 16 R’ Zilber says he originally found this idea in a book entitled<br />

written by R’ Pinchus Zalman Segal Ish-Horowitz published in 1905.<br />

17 For a list of the 89 “doubles” דף שבועי מספר see 334 by Eli Merzbach<br />

at (hereafter<br />

referred to as Merzbach).<br />

18 E.g., McKay and Cohen.<br />

19 For example: Should:<br />

) - words from different roots be counted? – No.<br />

Yes. - words in successive verses be counted? – ‏(שמות ז׃טז - יז)‏ כה כה *<br />

20 See Rambam ז׃ח - ט ‏.ס״ת Note that he never mentions which letters are<br />

big or small.<br />

21 See McKay for a much more critical assessment of the value of these<br />

“supposed” tests. The author asserts that the actual middle letter, word<br />

and verse would have been much more helpful.<br />

ברא שית יב׃א)‏ לך לך *

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!