11.11.2014 Views

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Symmetrically</strong> <strong>Designed</strong> <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong>: A <strong>Quantitative</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> : 195<br />

ד״ה ובסופו ‏-בסופו מניח חלק גדול כדי לגול בו כל הקיפו שאין עושה<br />

שני עמודים לגול לו לאמצעו כמו שאנו עושים לספר תורה אלא גוללו<br />

מתחילתו לסופו וכורך החלק על כל ההיקף.‏<br />

Rashi explains that unlike our <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong>, which have wooden<br />

rollers at both ends and are closed by rolling toward the middle, in<br />

prior times 41 there was a single wooden roller at the beginning and<br />

‏(בראשית side- the S”T were closed by rolling the beginning (right<br />

toward the end. Rashi also explains that the side that had no roller<br />

must have a greater amount of blank parchment that wrapped around<br />

the written part when it is rolled up. Tosfos, ועושה ‏,ד״ה disagrees with<br />

Rashi as to which side the roller is placed on a Sefer <strong>Torah</strong>, i.e. the<br />

single roller was at the end of the Sefer, not the beginning, and that<br />

the empty parchment was at the beginning, not the end. When<br />

exactly did this change from one roller to two rollers take place? We<br />

can perhaps pin the time of the change down based on the following<br />

conflicting three Baraisos:<br />

42<br />

מסכת ספר תורה ב׃ה-…ובתורה לא נתנו שיעור אלא עושה עמוד<br />

בסוף הספר ואינו צריך לעשות כן אלא בתחילתן.‏<br />

מסכת סופרים ב׃ה...מניחין אותו בסוף הדף כדי להקיפו עושה עמוד בסוף<br />

הספר בתחילה כדי להקיפו וא״צ לעשות כן בתחילתו ובתורה מכאן ומכאן<br />

לפיכך גוללין הספר לתחילתו ולתורה לאמצעית.‏<br />

43<br />

41 This is our understanding of Rashi. ArtScroll interprets the phrase in<br />

the second Rashi שאנו עושין לס״ת“‏ ‏”כמו not to differentiate between “us”<br />

(i.e. now) and “them” (i.e. in the past) but between S”T and other<br />

books. According to this view, Rashi never said that any S”T ever had 1<br />

roller. We reject this view because:<br />

• It is not the simple meaning of Rashi’s words.<br />

• Rashi ב״ב יד׃ ד״ה ספר העזרה לתחילתו says that the Sefer <strong>Torah</strong><br />

Moshe wrote and that was in the עזרה had but a single roller on<br />

the right.<br />

42 Tosfos ב״ב יג׃ bases part of his disagreement with Rashi on this and<br />

similar Baraisos that seem to say that the roller was at the end of the<br />

Sefer <strong>Torah</strong>.<br />

43 Several words (e.g. בתחילה ‏,אלא …) in this and the next Baraisa are<br />

problematic. Nevertheless, they clearly demonstrate that at one time a<br />

S”T had one yad and at another time had two.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!