11.11.2014 Views

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Symmetrically</strong> <strong>Designed</strong> <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong>: A <strong>Quantitative</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> : 179<br />

of this answer, R’ Isaac Zilber attempted to show a specific set of<br />

these “oddities” of which the וו of גחון is in fact the middle one.<br />

Many have challenged this answer 13 primarily on the grounds that any<br />

attempt at making a list of “unique” letters such that the וו of גחון is<br />

the middle letter:<br />

• Is purely arbitrary,<br />

• Does not fit R’ Yosef’s question and the Gemara’s attempt at<br />

resolving it,<br />

סופרים ט by: • Is contradicted<br />

‏.חצי אותיות של תורה<br />

i.e. it is a large letter only because it is the middle letter in the <strong>Torah</strong>.<br />

We feel the basic question is why the soferim would make such<br />

a list and identify its middle? As discussed previously, the soferim seem<br />

to have been practical people and/or codifiers, not theorists. It is<br />

highly unlikely that they would deal with the esoteric or metaphysical.<br />

Why then would they here indulge in this apparently nonessential<br />

exercise?<br />

4. Words<br />

‏:ב - ואו דגחון צריך להיות זקוף שהוא<br />

דרש דרש חציין של תיבות.‏<br />

The soferim’s choice of דרש דרש as the middle words in the<br />

<strong>Torah</strong> elicits no question or comment in the Gemara. However, a<br />

comparison of this choice of central words with our <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong> once<br />

again indicates a major discrepancy. The Gemara previously said that<br />

we are not experts in letters and later says we are not experts in<br />

verses. However, nowhere is there a claim that we are not<br />

knowledgeable of words. The idea that our <strong>Torah</strong> is missing words or<br />

14<br />

has extra words is inconsistent with our ‏.מסורה Table 1 lists the<br />

ויקרא י:טז,‏<br />

13 In addition to R’ Reuven Margalioth, see also Moriah 22 nd year, issue A-<br />

B [153-154], Elul 5788 (1998), hereafter referred to as McKay, at<br />

and Menachem Cohen (hereafter referred to as Cohen)<br />

at http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/dilugim/StatSci/middle_english.pdf.<br />

‏.שבת מט׃ 14 See Rashi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!