Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah
Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah
Symmetrically Designed Sifrei Torah: A Quantitative Analysis - Hakirah
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Symmetrically</strong> <strong>Designed</strong> <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong>: A <strong>Quantitative</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> : 179<br />
of this answer, R’ Isaac Zilber attempted to show a specific set of<br />
these “oddities” of which the וו of גחון is in fact the middle one.<br />
Many have challenged this answer 13 primarily on the grounds that any<br />
attempt at making a list of “unique” letters such that the וו of גחון is<br />
the middle letter:<br />
• Is purely arbitrary,<br />
• Does not fit R’ Yosef’s question and the Gemara’s attempt at<br />
resolving it,<br />
סופרים ט by: • Is contradicted<br />
.חצי אותיות של תורה<br />
i.e. it is a large letter only because it is the middle letter in the <strong>Torah</strong>.<br />
We feel the basic question is why the soferim would make such<br />
a list and identify its middle? As discussed previously, the soferim seem<br />
to have been practical people and/or codifiers, not theorists. It is<br />
highly unlikely that they would deal with the esoteric or metaphysical.<br />
Why then would they here indulge in this apparently nonessential<br />
exercise?<br />
4. Words<br />
:ב - ואו דגחון צריך להיות זקוף שהוא<br />
דרש דרש חציין של תיבות.<br />
The soferim’s choice of דרש דרש as the middle words in the<br />
<strong>Torah</strong> elicits no question or comment in the Gemara. However, a<br />
comparison of this choice of central words with our <strong>Sifrei</strong> <strong>Torah</strong> once<br />
again indicates a major discrepancy. The Gemara previously said that<br />
we are not experts in letters and later says we are not experts in<br />
verses. However, nowhere is there a claim that we are not<br />
knowledgeable of words. The idea that our <strong>Torah</strong> is missing words or<br />
14<br />
has extra words is inconsistent with our .מסורה Table 1 lists the<br />
ויקרא י:טז,<br />
13 In addition to R’ Reuven Margalioth, see also Moriah 22 nd year, issue A-<br />
B [153-154], Elul 5788 (1998), hereafter referred to as McKay, at<br />
and Menachem Cohen (hereafter referred to as Cohen)<br />
at http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/dilugim/StatSci/middle_english.pdf.<br />
.שבת מט׃ 14 See Rashi