04.11.2012 Views

FTSE Global Equity Index Series

FTSE Global Equity Index Series

FTSE Global Equity Index Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CDOs trace their origins to the late 1980s but the market<br />

really took off in 1996; (see, for example, data for CDOs<br />

rated by Moody’s in Figure 1: CDOs: Dramatic Growth to<br />

Record Levels in 2004).The early transactions were cash flow<br />

CDOs that allowed financial institutions to lay off credit<br />

risk through repackaged high-yield bonds but the structure<br />

soon spread to other asset classes. In today’s market, the<br />

assets most commonly securitised are high yield corporate<br />

loans and asset backed securities, but collateral extends<br />

from investment grade bonds to bank and insurance<br />

company preferred stocks and real estate.<br />

Cash flow CDO transactions dominated the market in<br />

the United States until the past couple of years, according<br />

to Drew Dickey, managing director and head of the<br />

structured credit team at Babson Capital Management,<br />

LLC. The absence of actively traded cash collateral bred a<br />

synthetic market in Europe, where credit risk was<br />

concentrated in banks rather than bonds. A synthetic CDO<br />

holds high quality near cash collateral and adds credit<br />

exposure through a portfolio of credit default swaps, which<br />

are effectively put options on default risk.<br />

CDOs challenge the efficient market hypothesis: why will<br />

investors pay more when the overall risk in a CDO equals<br />

the sum of the risks in its collateral portfolio? The structure<br />

adds value by facilitating the transfer of credit risk. Bill May,<br />

a managing director in Moody’s derivatives group, cites<br />

CDOs based on middle market bank loans as an example.<br />

The individual loans are relatively small and unrated; an<br />

institutional investor cannot afford to monitor enough<br />

companies to build a diversified portfolio. The lenders, who<br />

do track the companies, repackage the loans into CDOs,<br />

although they retain some exposure to each loan so<br />

investors know the sponsor has some skin in the game if a<br />

loan goes bad. In effect, CDO investors outsource the credit<br />

research and monitoring.“It gives investors an opportunity<br />

to invest in an asset class that they could never do on their<br />

own,”says May,“And it gives these small companies access<br />

to capital they could otherwise never get.”<br />

Artificial restrictions that require many investors to hold<br />

only rated instruments contribute to the repackaging<br />

arbitrage. “These portfolios are fairly diverse,” says Sivan<br />

Mahadevan, executive director and head of structured<br />

credit research at Morgan Stanley,“You can get investment<br />

grade ratings for a lot of the tranches that have even a little<br />

bit of subordination.” Rated CDO tranches command a<br />

premium because they appeal to a broader market.<br />

Senior CDO tranches find a home among pension funds,<br />

insurance companies, banks, and conduits set up by banks<br />

that use the high-quality assets as collateral to support<br />

commercial paper issued to money market mutual funds<br />

and other cash market investors. The mezzanine notes go<br />

to insurance companies, banks, mutual funds and hedge<br />

funds. <strong>Equity</strong> tranches appeal to banks and insurance<br />

companies looking for assets that offer leveraged returns<br />

relative to their regulatory capital requirement. Other<br />

investors willing to accept the risk (including hedge funds)<br />

buy equity for the high potential return.<br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> GLOBAL MARKETS • JULY/AUGUST 2005<br />

Drew Dickey, managing director and head of the structured credit<br />

team at Babson Capital Management<br />

CDOs challenge the efficient market<br />

hypothesis: why will investors pay more<br />

when the overall risk in a CDO equals<br />

the sum of the risks in its collateral<br />

portfolio?<br />

The allocation of losses in a CDO pool turns the equity<br />

and mezzanine tranches into leveraged plays on default<br />

risk – with price volatility to match. Hedge funds<br />

compounded that volatility by trading on margin. When<br />

the expected correlation between the equity and<br />

mezzanine tranches broke down, margin calls loomed as<br />

funds faced mark-to-market losses on both sides. “If you<br />

buy something on mark-to-market leverage you tend to<br />

give up the freedom to have your own view of the world,”<br />

Babson Capital Management’s Dickey says, “You can<br />

think that pricing is completely absurd. It might be absurd.<br />

But that doesn’t really matter when you have to put up<br />

more collateral.”<br />

In theory, correlation refers to the probability that if one<br />

credit in a CDO pool defaults other credits will also default.<br />

In practice, correlation is not a measurable input to the<br />

pricing model, according to Dickey. Companies don’t<br />

default often enough to generate reliable data on credit<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!