04.11.2012 Views

FTSE Global Equity Index Series

FTSE Global Equity Index Series

FTSE Global Equity Index Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDEX REVIEW: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE<br />

84<br />

benchmark indexes although the underlying differences<br />

are marginal with high correlations. Each index is closely<br />

correlated to its underlying benchmark index. Over a fiveyear<br />

period the tracking errors are higher with the<br />

individual country indexes, while the regional indexes of<br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Developed, <strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Europe, and <strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Euro<br />

CGI show a five-year tracking error of 1.09%, 1.32%, and<br />

1.11% respectively.<br />

Although separate from the index methodology, analysis<br />

based around a sample portfolio containing the top 50 and<br />

bottom 50 constituents from each theme within the <strong>FTSE</strong><br />

US <strong>Index</strong> universe has shown that the bottom 50<br />

underperform the top 50 in four out of five themes over a<br />

five-year period. The analysis based on equally weighting<br />

the portfolios on a daily basis using FactSet Software,<br />

shows this out-performance when using the overall<br />

company CGI rating. Apart from the theme Board Structure<br />

each bottom 50 portfolio also under-performs an equally<br />

weighted <strong>FTSE</strong> US <strong>Index</strong>. The Compensation theme<br />

interestingly has a negative performance over the period of<br />

one year, with the highest volatility of all the themes over<br />

the five-year period.<br />

Given the level of specific information available at<br />

present, there is no definitive link between corporate<br />

governance and stock returns. The performance analysis<br />

on the US is only a starting point, and by no means<br />

conclusive over a five year period. But, over reasonable<br />

time periods it is likely that governance factors will show<br />

themselves in investment returns. There are a number of<br />

reasons put forward for this. One is that sufficient<br />

information to make detailed decisions by all investors has<br />

The <strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Corporate Governance <strong>Index</strong> <strong>Series</strong><br />

Review Universes<br />

Universe <strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> All-Share <strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> North America<br />

<strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> Developed<br />

Europe ex UK <strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> UK <strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> Developed Asia<br />

Pacific ex Japan <strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> Japan <strong>Index</strong><br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> ISS CGI<br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> ISS UK CGI<br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Developed<br />

CGI<br />

The design process aims to capture 80% of the market<br />

cap within each Supersector<br />

not been available. Analysis of corporate governance is a<br />

skilled affair and the general investment community<br />

encompassing asset owners and managers does not have<br />

the necessary skills or resources to carry out such<br />

investigations across all of their investments.<br />

Further, corporate governance is not a one-off due<br />

diligence exercise. It is a continuous process. Having carried<br />

out the initial work on a company, the corporate governance<br />

risk then takes on the mantle of a watching brief. As a<br />

consequence, there is a requirement for continual<br />

monitoring of corporate governance due diligence.<br />

Another consideration is that there have been some high<br />

profile investment firms that take corporate governance<br />

very seriously and have done so for some years and applied<br />

their views to their investments. In the main however many<br />

investors (and legislators) only really began to tackle these<br />

issues in the wake of scandals such as WorldCom and<br />

Enron. Any corporate governance effect would only have<br />

been noticeable at some stage after these events.<br />

In short, it can be argued even now, that any corporate<br />

governance implementation will at best be applied in a<br />

somewhat unstructured way particularly across a number<br />

of markets. This will help to dissipate any potential “return<br />

effects”. Differing legislation and codes of practice can<br />

affect the returns within a country. If all companies within<br />

a country fall into line then the issues that the rules are<br />

meant to rectify will in effect be removed from that market.<br />

As time goes by it is fair to assume that a more cohesive<br />

implementation by market practitioners around the world<br />

will come into play. When this occurs there may well begin<br />

to be noticeable return effects.<br />

The <strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Corporate Governance <strong>Index</strong> <strong>Series</strong><br />

Construction Methodology<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Rank by Corporate<br />

Governance (CGI) Final Score<br />

Highest<br />

Lowest<br />

1<br />

Basic Resources<br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> Japan<br />

Oil & Gas Review Process<br />

<strong>FTSE</strong> ISS Japan<br />

CG <strong>Index</strong><br />

Chemicals<br />

5<br />

Oil & Gas Basic Resources Chemicals<br />

6<br />

4<br />

Cumulative<br />

Investable Mcap<br />

Construction<br />

& Materials<br />

80%<br />

20%<br />

Construction<br />

& Materials<br />

JULY/AUGUST 2005 • <strong>FTSE</strong> GLOBAL MARKETS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!