16.11.2014 Views

digital compensation of dynamic acquisition errors at the front-end of ...

digital compensation of dynamic acquisition errors at the front-end of ...

digital compensation of dynamic acquisition errors at the front-end of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 Chapter 2: Nonlinearity <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> ADC’s Front-End<br />

Devi<strong>at</strong>ion from <strong>the</strong> straight line (Q)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

8 x V in<br />

(V)<br />

Figure 2.14: Devi<strong>at</strong>ion from a straight line in <strong>the</strong> plot <strong>of</strong> charge injection vs. input<br />

voltage. Total charge is defined as <strong>the</strong> charge on <strong>the</strong> capacitor <strong>at</strong> full<br />

scale, Q total =2pF×1V=2e -12 C.<br />

⎛ Q<br />

Charge Linearity<br />

⎟ ⎞<br />

error<br />

= −20 × log<br />

⎜<br />

(2.3)<br />

⎝ Qtotal<br />

⎠<br />

where Q error is <strong>the</strong> devi<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge injection plot from <strong>the</strong> straight line and Q total<br />

is <strong>the</strong> total charge on <strong>the</strong> capacitor (see Figure 2.14).<br />

Figure 2.15 includes several plots showing <strong>the</strong> linearity performance <strong>of</strong> (2.3),<br />

defined for <strong>the</strong> bottom-pl<strong>at</strong>e track-and-hold circuit, versus different circuit parameters.<br />

Figure 2.15(a) shows <strong>the</strong> charge linearity performance vs. size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom transistor<br />

(W 2 ). It can be observed from this figure th<strong>at</strong> nonlinearity due to charge injection is<br />

reduced by reducing size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom transistor. This is due to <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> a smaller<br />

switch provides less charge injection. Figure 2.15(b) shows th<strong>at</strong> linearity is improving<br />

with increasing size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> top switch, M 1 . Using a larger switch size reduces <strong>the</strong><br />

nonlinear section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impedance seen <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> drain <strong>of</strong> M 2 and hence reduces <strong>the</strong><br />

nonlinear part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge injection. Figure 2.15(c) also shows th<strong>at</strong> linearity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!