CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority
CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority
CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76. The issues that supervisors are expected to assess can be broken<br />
down into five phases: 8<br />
1. Methodology and documentation.<br />
2. Data quality.<br />
3. Quantitative procedures.<br />
4. Qualitative procedures.<br />
5. Technological environment.<br />
77. In assessing IRB applications, the issues are:<br />
1. Methodology and documentation: Supervisors will examine and<br />
assess the rating system methodology and the quality of internal<br />
documentation supporting the rating system.<br />
2. Data quality: Supervisors will assess the quality of data and<br />
databases being used for the development of the rating systems,<br />
in the rating assignment process, and in the estimation of risk<br />
parameters, along with any other databases needed to calculate<br />
minimum regulatory capital. This is to ensure the soundness of<br />
calibration and of the capital calculation. (The latter holds true<br />
also for the other four items mentioned here.)<br />
3. Quantitative procedures: Supervisors will assess the quantitative<br />
information provided by the applicant relating to performance,<br />
validation, and monitoring of rating systems. Supervisors may ask<br />
applicants to undertake additional analyses and may undertake<br />
quantitative procedures of their own.<br />
4. Qualitative procedures: This phase has two objectives. The first is<br />
to perform an overall assessment of the quality of the internal<br />
model. This involves integrating all the information generated in<br />
the previous phases and discussing with the applicant the<br />
appropriate interpretation of the data with respect of the quality<br />
of the rating system. The second objective is to assess<br />
compliance with the qualitative minimum regulatory<br />
requirements. Supervisors will assess the use test, internal<br />
governance, the role of senior management, the adequacy of<br />
internal controls, and other areas in order to assess the<br />
qualitative aspects of the rating system that have a bearing on<br />
the approval and to check for compliance with the minimum<br />
qualitative requirements.<br />
5. Technological environment: Supervisors will evaluate the<br />
reliability and integration of systems, the functionality of the<br />
model, and the quality of information provided by systems.<br />
78. In assessing AMA applications, the issues are:<br />
8 The phases are numbered, suggesting a certain logical order, although in practice some<br />
phases will probably overlap.<br />
Page 21 of 123