22.11.2014 Views

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76. The issues that supervisors are expected to assess can be broken<br />

down into five phases: 8<br />

1. Methodology and documentation.<br />

2. Data quality.<br />

3. Quantitative procedures.<br />

4. Qualitative procedures.<br />

5. Technological environment.<br />

77. In assessing IRB applications, the issues are:<br />

1. Methodology and documentation: Supervisors will examine and<br />

assess the rating system methodology and the quality of internal<br />

documentation supporting the rating system.<br />

2. Data quality: Supervisors will assess the quality of data and<br />

databases being used for the development of the rating systems,<br />

in the rating assignment process, and in the estimation of risk<br />

parameters, along with any other databases needed to calculate<br />

minimum regulatory capital. This is to ensure the soundness of<br />

calibration and of the capital calculation. (The latter holds true<br />

also for the other four items mentioned here.)<br />

3. Quantitative procedures: Supervisors will assess the quantitative<br />

information provided by the applicant relating to performance,<br />

validation, and monitoring of rating systems. Supervisors may ask<br />

applicants to undertake additional analyses and may undertake<br />

quantitative procedures of their own.<br />

4. Qualitative procedures: This phase has two objectives. The first is<br />

to perform an overall assessment of the quality of the internal<br />

model. This involves integrating all the information generated in<br />

the previous phases and discussing with the applicant the<br />

appropriate interpretation of the data with respect of the quality<br />

of the rating system. The second objective is to assess<br />

compliance with the qualitative minimum regulatory<br />

requirements. Supervisors will assess the use test, internal<br />

governance, the role of senior management, the adequacy of<br />

internal controls, and other areas in order to assess the<br />

qualitative aspects of the rating system that have a bearing on<br />

the approval and to check for compliance with the minimum<br />

qualitative requirements.<br />

5. Technological environment: Supervisors will evaluate the<br />

reliability and integration of systems, the functionality of the<br />

model, and the quality of information provided by systems.<br />

78. In assessing AMA applications, the issues are:<br />

8 The phases are numbered, suggesting a certain logical order, although in practice some<br />

phases will probably overlap.<br />

Page 21 of 123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!