22.11.2014 Views

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

used to quantify the risk parameters associated with each<br />

grade or pool.<br />

· The CRD does not prescribe the philosophy that must<br />

underlie the grade or pool assignment in a rating system.<br />

Each philosophy results in a specific dynamics of ratings.<br />

The philosophy underlying the grade or pool assignment<br />

could be characterised by the extent to which a change in<br />

economic conditions is expected to result in a net<br />

migration of a large number of exposures, borrowers or<br />

facilities to other grades or pools (if the institution were<br />

to take no compensating policy actions), as opposed to<br />

migration of some exposures, borrowers or facilities to<br />

other grades or pools due only to their individual<br />

characteristics while leaving the number of exposures,<br />

borrowers or facilities in each grades or pools<br />

substantially unchanged, or a hybrid between these two<br />

extremes.<br />

326. In order to assess the appropriateness of the philosophy of a rating<br />

system, the institution has to at least:<br />

· <strong>Full</strong>y understand the philosophy underlying the grade or pool<br />

assignment, and specifically the risk drivers, and whether they<br />

create homogeneous buckets with respect to the targeted<br />

estimator. (An example for the PD dimension is whether the<br />

buckets are homogeneous with respect to the likelihood that each<br />

obligor in each risk bucket will default over the next year given<br />

all currently­available information, including obligor and<br />

economic information; or, alternatively, with respect to the<br />

likelihood that each obligor in each risk bucket will default over<br />

the next year given all available information and hypothetical<br />

stress­scenario economic conditions.)<br />

· Assess whether the method used to quantify the risk parameter<br />

is adequate for the philosophy underlying the grade or pool<br />

assignment.<br />

· <strong>Full</strong>y understand the characteristics, including the dynamics, of<br />

its ratings and of its risk parameter estimates.<br />

· Assess the adequacy of the resulting characteristics, including the<br />

dynamics, of the ratings and risk parameter estimates with<br />

regard to their different uses.<br />

· <strong>Full</strong>y understand the impact of the characteristics, including the<br />

dynamics, of the ratings and risk parameters estimates on the<br />

dynamics and volatility of capital requirements.<br />

327. For example, the institution should at least adopt and document<br />

policies which explain the philosophy of each rating system and how<br />

Page 77 of 123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!