CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority
CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority
CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
should start with inputs, and those inputs should be essentially the<br />
same whether used for credit management purposes or for<br />
regulatory calculation purposes.<br />
138. The rating systems used for rating obligors and exposures and for<br />
estimating risk parameters used in the calculation of capital<br />
requirements must also play an essential role in the relevant<br />
processes and functions of the institution. Moreover, the structure<br />
and design of the rating systems and capital calculation systems<br />
should not be fundamentally different, whatever the purpose,<br />
internal or regulatory.<br />
139. Any differences between the ratings and risk parameter estimates<br />
used in calculating capital requirements and the final parameters<br />
used internally should rely on a well documented rationale. There<br />
should be a robust audit trail, adhering to a specified internal policy.<br />
The purpose of this policy should be to assess the materiality of<br />
differences and whether they lead to conservatism or relaxation in<br />
capital adequacy. When pricing margins are calculated using nonIRB<br />
data, it would be useful for the institution to sort out both types of<br />
margins calculations and include conservatism in the calculation of<br />
the regulatory capital requirements. The more numerous the<br />
differences between the regulatory and the internal systems, the<br />
higher the internal governance standards should be.<br />
140. In areas relating to the credit risk assessment process (ratings, etc.)<br />
the final parameters used for internal purposes and the data used in<br />
calculating capital requirements are expected to be strictly in line. On<br />
the other hand, some flexibility is seen as possible for pricing and<br />
internal capital allocation. Not any internal used final default or loss<br />
estimate should render the estimate used in the calculation of capital<br />
requirements unplausible.<br />
141. Inputs identified as major for credit risk selection, estimation, and/or<br />
management for internal purposes should not be set aside for<br />
assigning ratings and estimating risk parameters used in the<br />
calculation of capital requirements. Credit selection in the corporate<br />
exposure class depends heavily on the financial statements of the<br />
corporates, This source of information and related analysis should<br />
not be missing from the criteria used for regulatory rating and PD<br />
estimation purposes.<br />
142. Special attention will be given to LGDs and CFs. These parameters<br />
must have been estimated and used in a broadly consistent manner<br />
for three years prior to permission being granted. This period may be<br />
reduced to no less than two years until 31 December 2008, during<br />
the experience test (see below), and during use test in a full<br />
consistent manner for a period appropriate to ensure accuracy and<br />
consistency of those estimates according to Article 84(2) (b) before<br />
their usage for calculation of regulatory capital requirements can be<br />
validated.<br />
Page 35 of 123