22.11.2014 Views

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

CP10 (Full Document) - European Banking Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

should start with inputs, and those inputs should be essentially the<br />

same whether used for credit management purposes or for<br />

regulatory calculation purposes.<br />

138. The rating systems used for rating obligors and exposures and for<br />

estimating risk parameters used in the calculation of capital<br />

requirements must also play an essential role in the relevant<br />

processes and functions of the institution. Moreover, the structure<br />

and design of the rating systems and capital calculation systems<br />

should not be fundamentally different, whatever the purpose,<br />

internal or regulatory.<br />

139. Any differences between the ratings and risk parameter estimates<br />

used in calculating capital requirements and the final parameters<br />

used internally should rely on a well documented rationale. There<br />

should be a robust audit trail, adhering to a specified internal policy.<br />

The purpose of this policy should be to assess the materiality of<br />

differences and whether they lead to conservatism or relaxation in<br />

capital adequacy. When pricing margins are calculated using non­IRB<br />

data, it would be useful for the institution to sort out both types of<br />

margins calculations and include conservatism in the calculation of<br />

the regulatory capital requirements. The more numerous the<br />

differences between the regulatory and the internal systems, the<br />

higher the internal governance standards should be.<br />

140. In areas relating to the credit risk assessment process (ratings, etc.)<br />

the final parameters used for internal purposes and the data used in<br />

calculating capital requirements are expected to be strictly in line. On<br />

the other hand, some flexibility is seen as possible for pricing and<br />

internal capital allocation. Not any internal used final default or loss<br />

estimate should render the estimate used in the calculation of capital<br />

requirements un­plausible.<br />

141. Inputs identified as major for credit risk selection, estimation, and/or<br />

management for internal purposes should not be set aside for<br />

assigning ratings and estimating risk parameters used in the<br />

calculation of capital requirements. Credit selection in the corporate<br />

exposure class depends heavily on the financial statements of the<br />

corporates, This source of information and related analysis should<br />

not be missing from the criteria used for regulatory rating and PD<br />

estimation purposes.<br />

142. Special attention will be given to LGDs and CFs. These parameters<br />

must have been estimated and used in a broadly consistent manner<br />

for three years prior to permission being granted. This period may be<br />

reduced to no less than two years until 31 December 2008, during<br />

the experience test (see below), and during use test in a full<br />

consistent manner for a period appropriate to ensure accuracy and<br />

consistency of those estimates according to Article 84(2) (b) before<br />

their usage for calculation of regulatory capital requirements can be<br />

validated.<br />

Page 35 of 123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!