28.11.2014 Views

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.16.2 Photoelectron Angular Distribution<br />

In previous versions of EGS newly created photoelectrons were set in motion in the same direction<br />

as the initiating photon. This proved to be too approximate for some applications, and so to address<br />

this shortcoming, EGS4 was modified by Bielajew and Rogers to use the theory of Sauter[145] to<br />

determine photoelectron angles. Empirical justification for the use of this distribution has been<br />

given by Davisson and Evans[50], who showed that it applies even in the non-relativistic realm,<br />

despite being derived for relativistic electrons. The implementation of a non-relativistic formula<br />

due to Fischer[58] did not significantly impact simulation results, and so Sauter’s formula has been<br />

applied universally in the EGS code.<br />

Sampling the Sauter angular distribution<br />

The Sauter distribution[145] as given by Davisson and Evans[50] may be integrated over the azimuthal<br />

angle and cast in the form:<br />

where<br />

f(µ)dµ = 1 − µ2<br />

[1 + K(1 − βµ)]dµ (2.401)<br />

(1 − βµ)<br />

4<br />

µ = cos Θ<br />

β = v/c<br />

√<br />

γ = 1/ 1 − β 2<br />

K = (γ/2)(γ − 1)(γ − 2).<br />

Here µ is the cosine of the angle that the electron is ejected (with respect to the initiating photon<br />

direction), β is the speed of the electron relative to the speed of light and γ is the familiar relativistic<br />

factor. Although Equation 2.401 may be integrated easily, its integral can not be inverted<br />

analytically and so a direct sampling approach is not feasible. In addition, equation 2.401 may also<br />

be very sharply peaked in the forward direction, making rejection sampling inefficient. Therefore,<br />

we employ a mixed technique to sample for photoelectron angles. We make the separation:<br />

where<br />

is the directly sampled part, and<br />

g(µ) =<br />

f(µ) = g(µ)h(µ) (2.402)<br />

1<br />

[1 + K(1 − βµ)] (2.403)<br />

(1 − βµ) 3<br />

h(µ) = 1 − µ2<br />

1 − βµ<br />

(2.404)<br />

is sampled via the rejection method. g(µ) and h(µ) may be easily normalized so that ∫ 1<br />

−1 g(µ)dµ = 1<br />

and h(µ) ≤ 1 for all µ, resulting in efficient sampling. A more complete discussion of photoelectron<br />

angular distributions as adapted for EGS may be found elsewhere[30].<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!