28.11.2014 Views

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Angular distribution formulas<br />

The formula employed for the angular sampling routine is 2BS of Koch and Motz[91], which is the<br />

cross section, differential in photon energy and angle,<br />

dσ k,Θ = 4Z2 r0<br />

2 {<br />

dk 16y 2<br />

137 k ydy E<br />

(y 2 + 1) 4 − (E 0 + E) 2 [<br />

E<br />

2<br />

E 0 (y 2 + 1) 2 E0<br />

2 + 0 + E 2 4y 2 ] }<br />

E<br />

(y 2 + 1) 2 E0<br />

2 −<br />

(y 2 + 1) 4 ln M(y) ,<br />

E 0<br />

(2.149)<br />

where,<br />

( ) (<br />

1 k 2<br />

y = E 0 Θ;<br />

M(y) = Z 1/3 ) 2<br />

+<br />

2E 0 E 111(y 2 ,<br />

+ 1)<br />

and, the following definitions for the variables apply:<br />

k energy of the photon in units of m e c 2<br />

Θ angle between the outgoing photon and the incoming electron direction (in radians)<br />

Z atomic number of the target material<br />

r 0 ≡ e 2 /m e c 2 (classical electron radius)<br />

E 0 , E initial and final electron energy in units of m e c 2<br />

The following table, copied from the Koch and Motz article, outlines the essential approximations<br />

employed in the derivation of Equation 2.149.<br />

Approximation<br />

Condition of validity<br />

i) Approximate screening potential (Ze/r)e −r/a<br />

ii) Born approximation (2πZ/137β 0 ), (2πZ/137β) ≪ 1<br />

iii) Extreme relativistic E 0 , E, k ≫ 1<br />

iv) Small angles sin Θ = Θ<br />

v) Approximate e − angular integration Θ < (Z 1/3 /111E 0 )<br />

It should be noted that only the angular distribution part of Equation 2.149 is employed. The<br />

cross section differential in photon energy employed by the <strong>EGS5</strong> code is far less restrictive (Approximation<br />

(iii) plus Thomas-Fermi screening factors). For the purposes of modeling electron linacs,<br />

the ultimate test of these approximations is comparison with experiment. In this regard, Koch and<br />

Motz present encouraging data (their Figure 17) which exhibits excellent agreement between experiment<br />

and Equation 2.149 for 4.54 MeV electrons on Au. Although use of Equation 2.149 violates<br />

constraints ii), iii) and iv) in the cases they showed, the deviation was at worst 10% (at large angles)<br />

and usually much better. In particular, violating the Born approximation constraints seemed not<br />

especially deleterious to the comparison. The conditions of this experiment are similar to those<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!