28.11.2014 Views

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

THE EGS5 CODE SYSTEM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ICRU37-compliant using the NIST database ESPA[148]. Effectively, this modification globally<br />

renormalizes EGS4’s bremsstrahlung cross section so that the integral of the cross section (the<br />

radiative stopping power) agrees with that of ICRU Report 37[20, 79]. This improvement can lead<br />

to noticeable changes in the bremsstrahlung cross section for particle energies below 50 MeV[54]<br />

and significant differences for energies below a few MeV where bremsstrahlung production is very<br />

small[124]. These new capabilities were carried over to <strong>EGS5</strong>.<br />

Low-energy elastic electron cross section modeling<br />

It has long been acknowledged that the Molière multiple scattering distribution used in EGS4<br />

breaks down under certain conditions. In particular: the basic form of the cross section assumed<br />

by Molière is in error in the MeV range, when spin and relativistic effects are important; various<br />

approximations in Molière’s derivation lead to significant errors at pathlengths less than 20 elastic<br />

scattering mean free paths; and the form of Molière’s cross section is incapable of accurately<br />

modeling the structure in the elastic scattering cross section at large angles for low energies and<br />

high atomic number. It is therefore desirable to have available a more exact treatment, and in<br />

<strong>EGS5</strong>, we use (in the energy range from 1 keV to 100 MeV) elastic scattering distributions derived<br />

from a state-of-the-art partial-wave analysis (an unpublished work) which includes virtual orbits at<br />

sub-relativistic energies, spin and Pauli effects in the near-relativistic range and nuclear size effects<br />

at higher energies. Additionally, unlike the Molière formalism of EGS4, this model includes explicit<br />

electron-positron differences in multiple scattering, which can be pronounced at low energies.<br />

The multiple scattering distributions are computed using the exact approach of Goudsmit and<br />

Saunderson (GS)[63, 64]. Traditionally, sampling from GS distributions has been either prohibitively<br />

expensive (requiring computation of several slowly converging series at each sample)<br />

or overly approximate (using pre-computed data tables with limited accuracy). We have developed<br />

here a new fitting and sampling technique which overcomes these drawbacks, based on a scaling<br />

model for multiple scattering distributions which has been known for some time[27]. First, a change<br />

of variables is performed, and a reduced angle χ = (1−cos(θ))/2 is defined. The full range of angles<br />

(0 ≤ θ ≤ π, or 0 ≤ χ ≤ 1) is then broken into 256 intervals of equal probability, with the 256 th<br />

interval further broken down into 32 sub-intervals of equal spacing. In each of the 287 intervals or<br />

sub-intervals, the distribution is parameterized as<br />

f(χ) =<br />

α<br />

(χ + η) 2 [1 + β(χ − χ −)(χ + − χ)]<br />

where α, β and η are parameters of the fit and χ − and χ + are the endpoints of the interval.<br />

By using a large number of angle bins, this parameterization models the exact form of the<br />

distribution to a very high degree of accuracy, and can be sampled very quickly (see Chapter 2 for<br />

the details of the implementation).<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!