25.12.2014 Views

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The LEM's Problems / Chap. 11 p. 95<br />

Loading —<br />

To reduce the weight of the Apollo 11 capsule, <strong>NASA</strong> was reduced to scraping away<br />

Mylar insulation. This play paid off because it enabled the intrepid, Neil Armstrong to jink<br />

sideways a hundred yards and safely land on the last of his fuel. ""Thirty seconds," says<br />

Houston. That's how much fuel they have left. Better get it on the ground, Neil."" 33<br />

It seems logical to me, that if the Lem could have carried more fuel, <strong>NASA</strong> would have<br />

enlarged the fuel tanks instead of scraping Mylar As shown by the following set of charts,<br />

the Moon's gravity was as expected, or lower. It couldn't have been stronger because each<br />

mission added more scientific equipment for the ALSEP science tests. The series of four<br />

charts below labeled figure "a" through "d" respectively, can be found on page 2-2 in a 1973<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> publication entitled APOLLO 17 Preliminary Science Report.<br />

MISSION DATA ON WEIGHT, TIME OUTSIDE LEM AND DISTANCE TRAVERSED<br />

Mission Traverse Time Spent Experimental Samples<br />

Distance<br />

Outside (hr) Equipment<br />

Retrieved<br />

(km) (mi)<br />

(kg) (lb)<br />

(kg) (lb)<br />

Apollo 11 .2 .1 2:24 102 225 21 46<br />

Apollo 12 2.0 1.2 7:29 166 366 34 75<br />

Apollo 14 3.3 2.0 9:23 209 460 43 95<br />

Apollo 15 27.9 17.3 18:33 550 1212 77 170<br />

Apollo 16 27.0 16.7 20:12 563 1241 94 207<br />

Apollo 17 35.0 21.7 22:05 514 1131 110 243<br />

If we compare the weight carried by Apollo 11 to that of Apollo 16 we find an increase<br />

in weight of 1016 pounds. 34 The chart says very clearly that the load from the extra<br />

equipment represented only scientific experimental equipment for the ALSEP experiments.<br />

But please note, I find no reason to consider the Rover as experimental equipment. The<br />

Rover weighed 460 pounds 35 bringing the total increase in weight to 1476 pounds. 36<br />

If an 80 pound back pack life support system (PLSS) lasted each astronaut for four<br />

hours, as <strong>NASA</strong>'s claims, then they had to carry either eight more units or re-fills on the<br />

Apollo 16 mission. That is an additional load of up to 640 pounds, bringing us to a possible<br />

maximum of 2116-pounds additional weight on the descending LEM. 37 I cannot begin to<br />

guess how much additional "landing" fuel this much extra weight would require even if we<br />

suppose that nothing else had to be added to extend the total time spent on the Moon. This<br />

added mass is over a ton. All I can say is they must have scraped off an awful lot of Mylar!<br />

Solar Radiation —<br />

This may be the proper place to speak of the extra deadly radiation that is emitted by<br />

solar flares. Collins seems to have fluffed off this problem when he wrote, "In similar<br />

fashion, the Van Allen Radiation belts around the earth and the possibility of solar flares<br />

require understanding and planning to avoid exposing the crew to an excessive dose of<br />

radioactivity." 38<br />

If <strong>NASA</strong> had so much understanding of solar flares why did they send Apollo 8, 10, 11,<br />

and 12 out just when, as was known to any astronomer that the sunspot cycle with maxi-<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> MOONED AMERICA! / <strong>Rene</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!