25.12.2014 Views

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mass Murder or Utter Stupidity / Chap. 6 p. 43<br />

craft against the zero pressure outside in space. However, since we didn't have rockets to lift<br />

that sort of weight, we couldn't afford this luxury. We had to make light, tin foil capsules just<br />

to get into the ball game.<br />

The differential in pressure between the 14.7 psi (our normal atmospheric pressure) and<br />

the zero pressure of space amounts to 2116 pounds per square foot of outward loading on the<br />

enclosing wall of a capsule. Compare this figure with the floor of a house — which is<br />

designed to be safely loaded to only 30 pounds per square foot — and you will realize that<br />

relatively heavy metal is vital for skin and skeleton if you want to enjoy normal pressure. It<br />

is wall strength that prevents catastrophic and explosive depressurization of small capsules.<br />

The LEM's walls will be discussed in more detail later.<br />

Breathing Mixtures<br />

The greater lifting capacity of their rockets allowed the Soviets the luxury of using a<br />

mixture of 20 percent oxygen and 80 percent nitrogen — the equivalent to regular air.<br />

Naturally, it wasn't stored on board as bulky "compressed air". It was stored separately as<br />

liquids in cryogenic tanks. However, the nitrogen supply was smaller, since the gas is inert<br />

to the human body, and additional nitrogen is required only to help re-establish pressure<br />

when the cabin is vented to space. Oxygen tanks were larger because the only oxygen used<br />

was that small portion converted into CO 2 by the necessity of breathing. This is immediately<br />

removed from the cabin by chemicals. A great deal is also lost when the cabin is vented to<br />

space during depressurization.<br />

Pure Oxygen<br />

Lacking strong-walled capsules, <strong>NASA</strong> decided right from the beginning to use 50 percent<br />

oxygen and 50 percent nitrogen at 7 psi. This specification was changed in August 1962<br />

into the use of pure oxygen at 5 psi. I0<br />

A policy shift of this nature indicates that approved design of the capsules that were<br />

manufactured was weaker than expected. The amazing thing is that <strong>NASA</strong> made this deadly<br />

decision despite testing that usually ended in disaster. One would think that after testing<br />

showed disaster one would never implement a dangerous policy. But <strong>NASA</strong> was in a race<br />

with destiny. They had no time for common sense.<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> Tests<br />

Here is a list of all government-sponsored testing that resulted in oxygen fires. This<br />

information was extracted from Appendix G in MISSION TO THE MOON written by<br />

Kennan & Harvey.<br />

"September 9, 1962 — The first known fire occurred in the Space Cabin Simulator at<br />

Brooks Air Force Base in a chamber using 100 % oxygen at 5 psi. It was explosive and<br />

involved the CO 2 scrubber. Both occupants collapsed from smoke inhalation before<br />

being rescued."<br />

"November 17, 1962 — Another incident using 100 % oxygen at 5 psi in a chamber<br />

at the Navy Laboratory (ACEL). There were four occupants in the chamber, but the<br />

simple replacing of a burned-out light bulb caused their clothes to catch on fire. They<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> MOONED AMERICA! / <strong>Rene</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!