Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

The Radioactivity Addendums p. 171
On June 24, 1996,1 received a copy of a letter sent to Bill Kaysing, a writer on the NASA
hoax from Apollo "astro-not" (not a typo) James "Liar" Lovell of Apollo 13 fame. He wrote that
Bill had a screw loose and he was wasting his life by doubting NASA. About 3 weeks later Liar
Lovell was interviewed in Illinois by a California newspaper (Bill's home territory). He went further,
calling Bill a "whacko". The fact that he personally sent me a copy of his letter before the article,
proved the libel was both malicious and premeditated.
Bill filed a libel suit and the war was on. I joined the fight to handle the space technology.
On our first interogatory we asked if Liar Lovell had ever heard of me. Lovell committed perjury
by denying this. I then sent him two technical interogatories and held the best for the last. The
jury trial date was October 3, 1997, and late that August, I fired that one off. Knowing that he had
to stay within NASA's "party line", I designed the questions accordingly.
In response to one question which asked for his official radiation exposure for his two trips
to the Moon, he answered," .4 rem", which is 400 millirem. The time required to pass through
this belt is over an hour each way. He spent at least six hours in transit and according to Van Allen,
his exposure had to range between 60 and 240 rem. And that was just getting this human guinea
pig through the Van Allen shield.
Then Liar Lovell's attorney, probably fearing the jury, raced to the judge and asked for a
summary judgement. For reasons unknown, Bill didn't present my tight four page rebuttal which
consisted of copies of Liar Lovell's letter to me and its envelope, the fact that he denied knowing
me and also the evidence showing deep contradiction between his reported dosage and Van Allen's
work on radiation. Instead, Bill handed in 22 pages of dribble. The summary was granted!
Which brings us to the fact that, by Lovell's own admission, if he actually went to the
Moon then he was a human guinea pig. He was supposed to be on the first flight to go through the
shield. There are no records of any flight ever sent through the shield carrying mammals. When
Lovell was asked to provide me (Kaysing) with information of any such flight he claimed he didn't
know of any. Would you send human guinea pigs,especially men with the right stuff, into a region
which your instruments had pronounced to be a radioactive hell before you sent in monkeys or
apes No Then why would NASA
# 3 Dr. Frank Greening
Since I first started the research that led to this book, I have been searching for absolute
proof that James Van Allen's original research, on what was to be called the Van Allen Belts, was
correct. He found radiation that sent his Geiger counters off scale, radiation high enough to be
lethal to humans who passed through.
After almost a decade of searching (chronicled in this book) Dr. Frank Greening of
Ontario, Canada has shared his work with me by giving me some of the following research and the
radiation values of the Van Allen Belts. As usual, opinions are mine!
As you read this, bear in mind that even the government agrees that a maximum lifetime
dose is 25 rads and that death always begins after 500 rads. In addition, this information has
also allowed me to safely conjecture about the radiation in the region of space past the Belts and
between Earth and the Moon.
From the pages of an article "Radiation Protection During Space Flight" which was
found in the 1983 "Journal of Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine", Dr. Greening,
extracted this statement "Dose equivalent rate from electrons in the heart of the Van Allen Belt
is 280,000 rad per day." Dividing by the seconds in a day we find 3.2 rads per second. The only
unanswered question here is, "How wide is the heart"
From the McGraw-Hill "Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, Vol. 19, pages 163-
167, I found additional information and scale sketches of the Belts which are basically composed
of an
NASA MOONED AMERICA! / Rene