Rene-NASA-Mooned-America
Rene-NASA-Mooned-America
Rene-NASA-Mooned-America
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sunstroke / Chap. 15 p. 136<br />
axis. How did they know this after uncoupling Did the service module have its own<br />
Inertial Measuring Unit Its own computer And where did all that extra fuel come from<br />
Did <strong>NASA</strong> really aim a metallic shell about whose atoms we know little, into a Sun about<br />
which we know less, to produce an effect about which we know nothing<br />
The previous statement was a paraphrase of a statement Voltaire made in speaking about<br />
doctors. "We put drugs about which we know little, into bodies about which we know less,<br />
to cure diseases about which we know nothing."<br />
Some heterodox scientists believe that some solar flares are triggered by meteorites that<br />
crash into the Sun. If this is true, would a small metallic shell mass be enough to cause the<br />
Sun to burp There's an even worse possibility. Could the spectacular solar storms of August<br />
1972 have been generated by a service module of a previous mission hitting the Sun It's<br />
more likely to have been sent into a solar orbit — part of the accumulating space debris that<br />
<strong>NASA</strong> now admits is an increasing problem. However, if this was the case, how could<br />
Skylab's heat build-up have been a surprise Does this mean that one branch of "Never A<br />
Straight Answer" doesn't even tell its other branches the truth Hell, do any of our<br />
bureaucracies even know the truth any more<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Regarding damage to living things we find the following passage in Mallan's book. "But<br />
on much longer, later flights in earth-orbiting satellites, bacteria, seedlings, and insects<br />
showed remarkable changes caused by radiation strikes in combination with weightlessness."<br />
24 He goes on to describe some of the mutations but swallows <strong>NASA</strong>'s explanation that these<br />
effects don't count because the insects have much shorter life spans than people. If this was<br />
true how can they explain the incredible capacity of the cockroach to absorb radiation All<br />
of these flights stayed well below the Van Allen shield. This book was published in 1971<br />
when there were still a couple of Apollo missions left to do. Why wasn't this ever spoken of<br />
in the popular press or on TV. When did these findings change How could lack of gravity<br />
affect the genes of bacteria, seedlings and insects<br />
When Mallan speaks of longer flights they are all less than a week in duration. What<br />
happened to all the humans who orbited for much longer periods of time Many of them<br />
were still young enough to have had kids. Did <strong>NASA</strong> intentionally release more genetic time<br />
bombs into the gene pool What amounts of radiation are the shuttle people absorbing.<br />
A dosimeter is worn by every astro-not and I have never seen any data about the absorbed<br />
REM from even the shuttle people, let alone the Apollo astro-nots, who didn't have<br />
the protection provided by the Van Allen shield. I now know that on very high altitude<br />
flights aircraft skins accumulate radioactive particles which are dangerous to those who<br />
contact them. What dosage is on the shuttle skin Do we ever hear anything about that<br />
<strong>NASA</strong> MOONED AMERICA! / <strong>Rene</strong>