Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

FX Pictures / Chap. 1 P-7
The Backdrop Begins
NASA titled this photo "Apollo XVI on the Moon." Just past the object of interest the
landscape becomes featureless. As in most NASA photos the background begins abruptly.
NASA states that this is because of the Moon's smaller diameter. Optical perspective is not
dependent on the distance to the horizon. Charles Duke was standing next to a geological
marvel and never saw it. Unless, of course, the marvel we are seeing here is nothing more
than an amateurish backdrop for a simulated shot taken in a secret government movie studio.
One NASA apologists claims to believe that the Rover is on a cliff edge. NASA claims it
chose each landing zone carefully to avoid cliffs and craters.
The large rock in the left foreground is clearly marked with a big capital "C". The
bottom right corner has a crease similar to that caused by wetting a folded newspaper. This
makes it a showbiz "flap" rock, which the people who work in Hollywood studios throw at
visitors. They used to be made from wet newspaper and paste and showed similar flaps.
Stage rocks are usually placed by stage hands over similarly lettered markers positioned by
the set designer. Did NASA really carry fake boulders and stage hands onto the Moon
The shadows of Astronaut and the Rover are in a different direction than the rocks
nearer the camera. Sunlight casts parallel shadows. I have no idea how this was
accomplished. Notice also that the Rover has left tracks that show an abrupt right angle turn.
Have you ever seen any vehicle that could do that It looks like stage hands lifted up the
front and dragged the Rover around to the left just before this picture was taken. Only a two
wheeled hand truck can leave such a track.
Notice the sharp footprints and tire tracks. A man who has tracked various animals in the
Australian desert pointed out that clear tracks in deep dust require moisture; otherwise they
form only indistinct depressions. I've done some tracking of my own and I instantly knew he
was right. The only clear tracks we can leave on a sand beach, no matter if the sand is fine or
course, is near the water. There are some ultra fine man-made materials that will take a track
at normal temperatures but I know of no dry natural soil here on Earth that has that property.
There can be no moisture on the Moon. Especially during the daytime when surface
temperatures are about 250 degrees. Couple this with the vacuum of space (which drastically
lowers the boiling point) and any water in the dirt would boil away in seconds. And yet,
every picture allegedly taken on the Moon shows clear footprints.
Another anomaly is found in the fact that the upright gnomen is casting a very dark
shadow right next to the "C" rock that is thinner than the diameter of the gnomen. Yet the
shadow of the legs are about the same size as the legs.
The Rover has an antenna at the front end. The camera has placed range finding crosshairs
on the photo. The top of the Rover's antenna was super-imposed over the second cross
from the top left. If NASA landed men on the Moon why were the photos faked On your
last vacation, did you go to a studio and simulate the pictures you took
NASA MOONED AMERICA! / Rene