25.12.2014 Views

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Numbers Game / Chap. 9 p. 78<br />

Mr. Gray also seems confused about the numbering system, but then to straighten it out<br />

he claims, "For reasons that would make sense only to a librarian, this flight was designated<br />

Apollo 7. (Apollo 1 had been set aside at the request of the widows for the flight that never<br />

took place, Apollo 2 and 3 never existed, and Apollo 4, 5, and 6 were unmanned flight<br />

tests.)" 9<br />

However, earlier in his book he tells us that in the spring and fall of 1966 two unmanned<br />

Apollo flights were indeed made. 10 On the other hand, didn't Frank Borman tell us there<br />

were three Apollo flights that year See what I mean Everybody seems to have been baffled<br />

by bullshit!<br />

Collins reported that the first Saturn V flight was on November 9, 1967 and it was, "A<br />

nearly perfect flight, it was not only the maiden voyage of the Saturn V but..." " That test<br />

flight took place close to 9 months after the fire. It also seems to show that <strong>NASA</strong>'s zero test<br />

policy was a macabre joke. And it proved that Apollo 1 was actually Apollo 1.<br />

As noted before, the 1B was too small to go to the Moon. Only the Saturn V could make<br />

that weighty haul, but at the time of the fire the Saturn V was still in development. For all I<br />

know it may still be in development. Bill Kaysing is positive the Saturn V never flew.<br />

Collins had this to say about the 1B rocket after the fire, "But we still had a hell of a long<br />

way to go; we weren't going to get Wally and crew airborne until summer 1968 at the<br />

earliest, and they were going on a puny Saturn IB rocket." 12 Note his accurate — for once —<br />

adjective, "puny"!<br />

No matter how you look at it three astronauts died in a fire in an obsolete capsule on top<br />

of a rocket far too small to do the job. Why were they in there The Apollo 7 boosted<br />

October 11, 1968 still using the 1B engine. Flight 503 flew on December 21, 1968 and<br />

Collins wrote of this flight, "502 had more than its share of problems, and had barely limped<br />

into earth orbit. The first stage had developed severe oscillations, two out of five secondstage<br />

engines had shut down, and the guidance system had overcompensated and put the<br />

vehicle into an orbit whose apogee was a hundred miles too high." 13<br />

Introducing even more confusion about the numbering Mr. Hurt writes the following<br />

paragraph.<br />

"The first series of unmanned Apollo missions, three far less ambitious earth orbital<br />

flights, were nearly catastrophic embarrassments. Apollo 4 suffered a fuel spill and a<br />

major computer malfunction. Apollo 5, the inaugural test flight of the lunar module,<br />

experienced two equally serious problems. When the hastily refurbished spacecraft<br />

finally got off the ground, the LEM's engine, which was supposed to fire for thirty-eight<br />

seconds at full power, only managed to burn for four seconds at ten percent thrust.<br />

Apollo six failed even more miserably. Due to a sequence of booster engine<br />

malfunctions, the spacecraft was catapulted into the wrong orbit before it got a chance to<br />

show its stuff." 14<br />

On Apollo 6 in "Journey To Tranquility' we find, "A film taken from a high-flying<br />

aircraft equipped with a radar-directed camera actually showed a piece of the rocket<br />

breaking away." 15<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> MOONED AMERICA! / <strong>Rene</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!