25.12.2014 Views

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

Rene-NASA-Mooned-America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Numbers Game / Chap. 9 p. 75<br />

THE NUMBERS GAME<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> has one of the best public relations (PR) departments of any agency in the country.<br />

Our taxes pay for the propaganda produced by this bureaucracy to keep us convinced at<br />

all times that <strong>NASA</strong> is 100 percent for the flag, God, science, motherhood, and the <strong>America</strong>n<br />

way. The only thing they seemed to have missed in the button pushing was apple pie! And<br />

they probably claimed somewhere that space research helps make better apples. No matter<br />

what transpired over the last 35 years, in the end, <strong>NASA</strong> came out smelling like a lilac bush<br />

in bloom.<br />

Never mind the normal disasters of incredible cost overruns. Forget the snail-like<br />

progress. Down through the years there were only two problems that really set <strong>NASA</strong> back<br />

on their heels. The first and worst was the barbecue that someone threw for Grissom,<br />

Chaffee and White. The second occurred almost 20 years later on January 28, 1986 when a<br />

few million pounds of liquid hydrogen and oxygen exploded, searing the Florida skies and<br />

destroying the Challenger Shuttle and its full crew.<br />

Since only fools refuse to realize that in blazing new technologies there "be" hidden<br />

dragons with diamond-hard flesh-ripping teeth, the second disaster worked its way out of the<br />

public's system in short order. The Challenger explosion called for another government<br />

committee. This one was the Rogers Commission, and its job was to point the fickle finger<br />

of fate at a culpable culprit.<br />

This turned out to be the people who made the sectional gaskets for the solid fuel rocket<br />

booster called an SRB. You may remember committee member and Nobel Prize winner<br />

Richard Feynman demonstrating on TV how the gasket material cracks when placed in a<br />

glass of ice water. The committee claimed that the cold temperatures that morning allowed<br />

the "lower" gasket to leak, thus allowing the burning rocket fuel to slice through the gasket<br />

and the joint when the burn line reached that level. Then the blazing hot gases lanced across<br />

the separation and stabbed into the cryogenic storage tank. Simple case, spectacular and<br />

deadly effect. Right Wrong!<br />

Collins reports that four sections comprise an SRB. 1 He also tells us, "On the other hand,<br />

the pieces of the right SRB corroborated the fact that a failure had occurred in the joint<br />

between the two lower segments — the aft field joint." 2<br />

In Liftoff the Collins book, on page 226, there is a very clear three-dimensional illustration,<br />

labeled "SRB joint cross-section" which shows the joint in great detail. Right next to it<br />

is a drawing of the shuttle before launch. A bold arrow starts at the joint detail and extends<br />

to the SRB's "lower" joint. He states, "The Rogers Commission interviewed more than 160<br />

individuals and amassed 12,000 pages of transcript." 3 It is too bad they didn't look at the TV<br />

pictures of that launch that clearly showed the spear of flame emanating near the top of the<br />

SRB rocket.<br />

As usual with government committees, their conclusion seems neither fits the facts nor<br />

the photographs. As another example, the Warren Commission told us that President Kennedy<br />

was shot from the rear, but the films taken at the time show his head to be the only object in<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> MOONED AMERICA! / <strong>Rene</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!