20140927_NIU_CJ7_TREX_SFA guide 3.1

Recommendations

Info

UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA, ISAF, NATO//FOUO This document is not approved for public release Current as of: 15 Jun 2014 POC: DCOS ANSF LOG DSN 318-449-9102 Process Highlights & Friction Points • ASC SPO validates MoD 14 and forwards to GSG4. • GSG4 approves via MoD 9. •MMC directs subordinate DEPOTs to fulfill request if O/H •Depots fill request if on hand. • CSD Releases; CMA Delivers • GSG4 insertion into the approval process • Demand Signal/ Inventory visibility / Excess Management • Catalog discrepancies • User Training for CORE IMS XXX • G4 validates request • MoD 14 forwarded to RLSC • MoD 14 to ASC • No appreciable connectivity with CORE IMS at Corps / RLSC I • CSSK check stocks on hand; if not available MoD 14 is sent to the RLSC • If MoD 14 is denied, no feedback provided • Unit request supply item and fills out MoD 14. • Signature required on MoD 14 by unit leadership X ANA Sustainment 30-35 Days 14-28 Days 4-6 Days 2-3 Days 2-3 Days Kandak submits MOD 14 XXXX ASC XXXXX GSG4 XXX RLSC (FSD) XXX G4 S4 II CSS II XXXX MMC CSD CMA 4-7 Days 2-3 Days 58-85 Days Total Process Improvements: EAC • Developing National Catalog • CORE IMS User Training • Increase frequency of CMA convoys • Advisors at key nodes XXX Corps/ RLSC • Literacy programs • Core-IMS Training and Network Expansion Plan includes RLSC X Unit/Kandak/CSSK/Brigade • Approved ASL followed by resourced ASL • Literacy programs Critical Node (Down) Critical Node (Up) Annex B MoD 9 fill at Kandak Friction Points Flow of MOD 14 Flow of MOD 9 Fill BLUF: • Overall, the bureaucracy of the Afghan supply system and low ASL levels at CSSK and RLSC creates an unresponsive system that has a best case response time of 2 – 3 months. • Difficulties with the National Catalog (multiple stock /part numbers for the same item) creates difficulties in the completion of the MoD 14. • MoD 14 can be killed at any level w/o feedback . • Immaturity of Afghan contracting takes 6 – 12 months to deliver which necessitates detailed Log planning at the MoD Level. UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA, ISAF, NATO//FOUO B 25
UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA, ISAF, NATO//FOUO This document is not approved for public release Current as of: 2 Dec 2013 POC: IJC ANSF DIR DSN 318-449-9524 Process Highlights & Friction Points • MoI identifies and develops requirements • Equipment is procured by DOL • MMC tracks equipment and requirements • NLC receives /ships equipment to RLC • Items are not in inventory • Delayed entry into country • Equipment shipped to RLC for distribution • RLC distributes to MSPs • Establishment of distribution plan • Establishing New Equipment Training (NET) • Limited MSP available ANP Equipment Fielding 2-3 Weeks MoI DOL MMC NLC RLC MSP Process Improvements: MoI • Requirements generation • Strategic planning • Bureaucratic issue process • Multiple Tashkils • Accountability • Established ASL determined and procured prior to fielding • Efficient Push and Movement of Equipment to Unit RLC • Accountability • New equipment training • Cross leveling • ASL establishment packages • HQs/Units receive equipment • Conduct New Equipment Training • NET planned but not conducted by all 2-3 Weeks NET 2-3 Days New Equipment Training HQs HQs/ Units • Sustainment package with initial fielding • New Equipment Training (NET) plan and Execution Critical Node (Down) Units Friction Points Flow of Equipment BLUF: • Equipment procured without full sustainment consideration. Results in part shortages and subsequently vehicles awaiting repairs. • Push letters not issued in a timely manner delaying fielding often > 30 days. • Once Title Transfers are complete vehicle visibility is lost and may be given to different recipients. B 26 UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA, ISAF, NATO//FOUO
Page 1 and 2:
RS Security Force Assistance Guide
Page 3 and 4:
UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter 1 UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Annex A UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //RE
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104: UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA
Page 129 and 130: Annex B UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //RE
Page 153: UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //REL to USA
Page 177 and 178: Annex C UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //RE
Page 191 and 192: Annex D UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //RE
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Annex E UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //RE
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Annex F UNCLASS//FGI ISAF NATO //RE
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
show all

20140927_NIU_CJ7_TREX_SFA guide 3.1

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?