31.12.2014 Views

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION - naspaa

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION - naspaa

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION - naspaa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Enhancing Professional Socialization<br />

Through the Metaphor of Tradition<br />

Margaret Stout<br />

West Virginia University<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This article explores how the metaphor of tradition can help educators foster<br />

specific public service attitudes in students of public administration, while<br />

simultaneously helping their students make sense of the diverse ideations<br />

presented in the field’s theories. This is of particular value because public<br />

administration is experiencing an identity crisis related to competing<br />

interpretations of legitimacy and associated role conceptualizations. In fact, the<br />

explication of multiple traditions throughout the program of study could help<br />

educators better achieve forthcoming accreditation mandates to demonstrate firm<br />

emphasis on public values.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Public administration education is an important element of professional<br />

socialization for both pre-service and in-service students. Master of Public<br />

Administration (MPA) programs help students form and adopt an ideation of<br />

the public administration role that can serve to (1) bring diverse occupations<br />

into a common sense of purpose, professional identity, and trust; (2) establish<br />

standards for professional action; and (3) provide legitimacy to the public<br />

(Stever, 1988). However, the presence of multiple and distinct ideations of<br />

public administration serves to intensify the ambiguity of the postmodern<br />

condition (see for example Catlaw & Stout, 2007), and exacerbates questions<br />

of legitimacy (see for example McSwite, 1997). For example, MPA programs<br />

have been found to instill the competing ethical standards of both the<br />

bureaucratic and the democratic ethos (Heijka-Ekins, 1988). Another<br />

examination of theories that promote progressive values found there were seven<br />

distinct approaches (Box, 2008). This sense of confusion may be mitigated in<br />

part by helping students become clear on the theoretical choices available<br />

within the field, the practical and philosophical implications of those choices,<br />

and the opportunity to identify with others who share similar beliefs and prefer<br />

a similar approach to action.<br />

JPAE 15(3): 289–316 Journal of Public Affairs Education 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!