02.01.2015 Views

Annual Report - 2005-06 - GAIL (India)

Annual Report - 2005-06 - GAIL (India)

Annual Report - 2005-06 - GAIL (India)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Estimated amount of Contracts<br />

remaining to be executed on<br />

Capital Account and not provided<br />

for is amounting to Rs.1057.30<br />

Crores (Previous Year : Rs.357.68<br />

Crores) which includes an amount<br />

of Rs.183.77 Crores (Previous Year<br />

Rs.92.08 Crores) related to joint<br />

ventures.<br />

4. Contingent Liabilities :-<br />

I. Claims against the Company<br />

not acknowledged as debts:<br />

Rs.9933.68 Crores (Previous<br />

Year: Rs.9225.29 Crores), which<br />

mainly include:<br />

(a) Claims of ONGCL for Rs.401.48<br />

Crores (Previous Year: Rs.248.46<br />

Crores) on account of interest<br />

for delayed payment and MGO,<br />

etc. Out of these MGO claims of<br />

Rs.53.78 Crores (Previous Year:<br />

Rs.49.23 Crores) are recoverable<br />

on back-to-back basis.<br />

(b) Income Tax demand of<br />

Rs.1289.74 Crores (Previous<br />

Year: Rs.1026.81 Crores relating<br />

to the assessment years<br />

1996-97 to 2002-03) relating<br />

to assessment years 1996-<br />

97 to 2003-04. This includes<br />

penalty demand of Rs.234.12<br />

Crores (Previous Year Rs.NIL)<br />

under section 271 (1) (C) of<br />

the Income Tax Act, 1961 for<br />

which stay application has<br />

been filed with CIT (A) and<br />

Delhi High Court. The Income<br />

tax assessment of the Company<br />

has been completed up to<br />

the assessment year 2003-04.<br />

Against the total demand, the<br />

Company has paid/adjusted<br />

Rs.1105.34 Crores (Previous Year: Rs.1024.52<br />

Crores) under protest. Based upon the<br />

decision of the appellate authorities and<br />

the interpretation of the provisions of the<br />

Income Tax Act, the Company has been<br />

legally advised that the demand is likely to<br />

be either deleted or it may be substantially<br />

reduced. The Company has filed appeals<br />

against the demand for the assessment<br />

years 1996-97 to 2002-03 with ITAT and for<br />

assessment year 2003-04 with CIT (A).<br />

(c) Sales Tax demand of Rs.3449.18 Crores<br />

(Previous Year: Rs.3449.18 Crores) and<br />

interest thereon Rs.1513.04 Crores (Previous<br />

Year: Rs.1513.04 Crores) for Hazira unit<br />

in Gujarat State: Sales Tax Authorities,<br />

Ahmedabad have treated the transfer of<br />

Natural Gas by the Company from the<br />

state of Gujarat to other states during<br />

the period April, 1994 to March, 2001 as<br />

inter-state sales under Section 3(a) of the<br />

Central Sales Tax Act. The Company has<br />

been paying sales tax under section 12<br />

of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act against Form<br />

17 since inception (1987) and accordingly<br />

the sales tax assessments have been<br />

completed. Based on the interpretation<br />

of the provisions of the Sales Tax Act and<br />

legal advice from the experts, the Company<br />

had filed writ petition and special leave<br />

petition in the Supreme Court of <strong>India</strong>. In<br />

February, <strong>2005</strong> the case was transferred by<br />

Hon’ble Supreme Court to Gujarat Sales Tax<br />

Tribunal for decision. The Tribunal has given<br />

its judgment on 16.05.<strong>2005</strong> accepting the<br />

contention of the Company for interstate<br />

transportation of Natural Gas as branch<br />

transfer and not the interstate sale and<br />

set aside the demand under section 41-B<br />

of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act. The Hon’ble<br />

Tribunal has given further instruction to the<br />

Assessing Authority to assess Company and<br />

decide tax liability in accordance with the<br />

law for the period 1998-99 to 2000-2001<br />

considering interstate transfer of natural<br />

gas as branch transfer.<br />

(d) Commissioner of Customs,<br />

Ahmedabad has issued show cause<br />

notices where in a sum of Rs.581.22<br />

Crores (Previous year: Rs.581.22<br />

Crores) for the period 22.<strong>06</strong>.97 to<br />

10.02.2002 has been demanded,<br />

by treating <strong>GAIL</strong> as importer under<br />

Section 2(26) of the Customs Act,<br />

1962 on account of purchase of<br />

gas from Tapti and Panna-Mukta<br />

fields from Joint Venture of British<br />

Gas Exploration and Production<br />

(I) Limited, RIL and ONGCL (JVCs).<br />

The Company is of the view that<br />

as it is purchasing gas from JVCs at<br />

Hazira at the downstream flange<br />

of ONGCL’s gas processing facilities<br />

along with other natural gas<br />

coming from South Basin, it is not<br />

liable to Customs Duty. The replies<br />

to Show cause notice have already<br />

been sent to the Commissioner<br />

of Customs in consultation with<br />

the Consultants on 14.<strong>06</strong>.2002. No<br />

further response has been received.<br />

(e) Excise duty demand of Rs.137.84<br />

Crores (Previous year: Rs.123.63<br />

Crores): Excise Authorities have<br />

raised demands at Vijaipur, by<br />

treating lean gas as gaseous<br />

hydrocarbon and denying<br />

exemption available to lean gas,<br />

which has all along been treated<br />

as an exempted product. The<br />

Company has obtained favourable<br />

orders against past and subsequent<br />

demands. This demand also has<br />

been set aside and pronounced in<br />

the open court by the CESTAT on<br />

19.04.20<strong>06</strong>. Written Order is yet to<br />

be received.<br />

II. Bonds executed, Letters of Credit :<br />

Rs.27.58 Crores (Previous Year: Rs.13.40<br />

Crores).<br />

III. An amount of Rs.90.35 Crores (Previous<br />

Year : Rs.83.03 Crores) relate to joint<br />

ventures and an amount of Rs.NIL<br />

(Previous Year : Rs.2.44 Crores) relate to<br />

associates.<br />

5 (a) Liability under Gas Pool Account<br />

includes gas pool money for<br />

January-March 20<strong>06</strong> quarter<br />

amounting to Rs.37.50 Crores<br />

(Previous Year: Rs.61.64 Crores)<br />

which shall become due for<br />

deposit in succeeding quarter.<br />

(b) Liabilities on account of Gas Pool<br />

Money amounting to Rs.726.67<br />

Crores (Previous year: Rs.723.18<br />

Crores) and 10% retention from<br />

JV consortium amounting to<br />

Rs.386.<strong>06</strong> Crores (Previous year:<br />

Rs.359.63 Crores) includes interest<br />

(net of TDS) amounting to Rs.47.38<br />

Crores (Previous year: Rs.32.30<br />

Crores) on Short term deposits<br />

for the year. The TDS amounting<br />

to Rs.9.56 Crores (Previous<br />

Year: Rs.7.09 Crores) have been<br />

deducted by the bankers on the<br />

interest earned on Short term<br />

deposits. This interest income<br />

and TDS does not belong to the<br />

Company hence not accounted for.<br />

6. MoP&NG had issued scheme for mechanism of<br />

sharing the under recoveries of Oil marketing<br />

Companies on account of non-revision in<br />

selling price of PDS Kerosene and domestic<br />

LPG. During the year, the Company has<br />

given discounts to Oil marketing Companies<br />

amounting to Rs.1<strong>06</strong>3.60 Crores (Previous Year:<br />

Rs.1136.90 Crores) on dispatches to them for<br />

sharing subsidies. Corresponding adjustment<br />

on account of CST amounting to Rs.21.32<br />

Croers (Previous Year Rs.20.54 Crores) has been<br />

made.<br />

7 a) The Company is raising provisional invoices<br />

for sale of R-LNG as the supplier PLL is also<br />

raising provisional invoices on the Company<br />

since customs duty on import of LNG by PLL<br />

has been assessed on provisional basis.<br />

b) With effect from April 1, 2002, Liquefied<br />

Petroleum Gas prices has been deregulated<br />

and is now based on the import parity<br />

prices fixed by the Oil Companies. However,<br />

the pricing mechanism is provisional and<br />

is pending finalisation. Additional asset/<br />

liability or impact on profits, if any, arising<br />

due to such change, will be recognized on<br />

finalization of pricing mechanism.<br />

8. a) The price of Gas purchased from Joint<br />

Venture Consortium (JVC) (<strong>India</strong>n and<br />

Foreign Partners) from Ravva / Ravva<br />

Satellite, Tapti and Panna Mukta fields are<br />

denominated in USD per MMBTU. The<br />

liability in USD has been converted at Bills<br />

Buying rate, TT selling rate and TT buying<br />

rate, prevailing as on 31.03.20<strong>06</strong> or on the<br />

date of payment, as the case may be.<br />

b) Imports have been accounted for at the<br />

exchange rate prevalent as on the date of<br />

retirement of documents being the date of<br />

transaction.<br />

9. Following Government of <strong>India</strong>’s<br />

approval, the shareholders of the<br />

Company in the <strong>Annual</strong> General<br />

Meeting held on 15th September,<br />

1997 approved the transfer of<br />

all the assets including Plant<br />

and Machinery, accessories and<br />

other related assets which are<br />

part of Lakwa Project valued at<br />

Rs.245.97 Crores as on 31.03.20<strong>06</strong><br />

(Previous Year: Rs.246.91 Crores)<br />

to Assam Gas Cracker Complex<br />

at a price to be determined by an<br />

independent Agency and on terms<br />

and stipulations as the Board may<br />

in its discretion deem fit. However,<br />

Assam Gas Cracker Complex has<br />

not come up as per plan and<br />

LPG Lakwa Project has not been<br />

transferred to it. Therefore, a fresh<br />

proposal has been put up to<br />

Govt of <strong>India</strong> to establish Assam<br />

Gas Cracker project by <strong>GAIL</strong> and<br />

LPG Lakwa Project will be part of<br />

that Assam Gas Cracker project.<br />

Government of <strong>India</strong> is in advance<br />

stage in establishing the Assam Gas<br />

Cracker project.<br />

10. Pending issue of suitable<br />

notification by the Government<br />

of <strong>India</strong> specifying the period and<br />

applicable rate at which cess on<br />

turnover is payable under section<br />

441A of Companies Act, 1956 the<br />

Company has not provided for the<br />

same.<br />

11. Balances grouped under Material<br />

with Contractors, Sundry Debtors,<br />

Loans and Advances, Deposits and<br />

Sundry Creditors, etc. are subject to<br />

confirmation.<br />

178 Winning Momentum 179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!