- Page 1 and 2:
Review of the Crimes (Mental Impair
- Page 3 and 4:
Published by the Victorian Law Refo
- Page 5 and 6:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 7 and 8:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 9 and 10:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 11 and 12:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 13 and 14:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 15 and 16:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 17 and 18:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 19 and 20:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 21 and 22:
xviii
- Page 23 and 24:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 25 and 26:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 27 and 28:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 30 and 31:
2 The CMIA: background and principl
- Page 32 and 33:
2 2.6 For the vast majority of peop
- Page 34 and 35:
2 2.16 Prior to these reviews, the
- Page 36 and 37:
2 Previous reviews of provisions in
- Page 38 and 39:
2 Victorian Parliament Law Reform C
- Page 40 and 41:
2 criminal law, 44 and is also reco
- Page 42 and 43:
2 Protection of the community 2.62
- Page 44 and 45:
2 Family members of people subject
- Page 46 and 47:
2 2.94 The CMIA’s therapeutic aim
- Page 48 and 49:
2 Principles governing the treatmen
- Page 50:
2 Victorian law Mental Health Act 1
- Page 53 and 54: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 55 and 56: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 57 and 58: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 59 and 60: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 61 and 62: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 63 and 64: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 65 and 66: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 67 and 68: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 69 and 70: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
- Page 72 and 73: 4 Unfitness to stand trial 52 Intro
- Page 74 and 75: 4 4.5 As stated in [4.11] below, un
- Page 76 and 77: 4 4.16 If an accused person is foun
- Page 78 and 79: 4 The test in Victoria: the ‘Pres
- Page 80 and 81: 4 Decision-making capacity or effec
- Page 82 and 83: 4 Question 3 Should the test for un
- Page 84 and 85: 4 or rational appreciation of the p
- Page 86 and 87: 4 4.57 However, expressly recognisi
- Page 88 and 89: 4 4.65 Some jurisdictions have legi
- Page 90 and 91: 4 Difficulty in assessing unfitness
- Page 92 and 93: 4 Requirement to ‘plead’ in a c
- Page 94 and 95: 4 The role of experts in the proces
- Page 96 and 97: 4 4.102 More broadly, some have que
- Page 98 and 99: 4 4.113 In DPP v CJC (CJC), 135 Jus
- Page 100 and 101: 4 4.121 The Law Reform Committee re
- Page 102 and 103: 4 Directions to the jury on finding
- Page 106 and 107: 5 Defence of mental impairment 86 I
- Page 108 and 109: 5 5.6 The term mens rea encompasses
- Page 110 and 111: 5 The defence of mental impairment
- Page 112 and 113: 5 Figure 2: Defence of mental impai
- Page 114 and 115: 5 Table 2: Other mental state defen
- Page 116 and 117: 5 5.48 While it is emphasised that
- Page 118 and 119: 5 If mental impairment is defined,
- Page 120 and 121: 5 The test for establishing the def
- Page 122 and 123: 5 Process for establishing the defe
- Page 124 and 125: 5 Jury involvement in the process a
- Page 126 and 127: 5 Order of considering the elements
- Page 128 and 129: 5 The approach to jury directions i
- Page 130 and 131: 5 The relevance of mental impairmen
- Page 132 and 133: 5 Appeals against findings of not g
- Page 134 and 135: 6 Application of the CMIA in the Ma
- Page 136 and 137: 6 6.4 In its criminal jurisdiction,
- Page 138 and 139: 6 Extending the application of the
- Page 140 and 141: 6 Issues with the lack of jurisdict
- Page 142 and 143: 6 The power to determine unfitness
- Page 144 and 145: 6 Discretionary power to make order
- Page 146 and 147: 6 Defence of mental impairment in t
- Page 148 and 149: 6 6.53 In the Australian Capital Te
- Page 150 and 151: 6 Orders under the Sentencing Act 1
- Page 152 and 153: 6 6.72 There are a number of orders
- Page 154 and 155:
6 6.83 It would also be important t
- Page 156 and 157:
7 Consequences of findings under th
- Page 158 and 159:
7 7.6 First, this chapter discusses
- Page 160 and 161:
7 7.15 When the court declares a pe
- Page 162 and 163:
7 7.32 In some cases, the unavailab
- Page 164 and 165:
7 Question 60 Are there appropriate
- Page 166 and 167:
7 7.56 In adopting this approach, t
- Page 168 and 169:
7 7.68 The Community Development Co
- Page 170 and 171:
7 7.83 Presented with these two opt
- Page 172 and 173:
7 7.97 It is also important that ot
- Page 174 and 175:
7 7.110 An example of an automatic
- Page 176 and 177:
7 7.124 In addition to the mandator
- Page 178 and 179:
7 7.139 VCAT rejected the Director
- Page 180 and 181:
8 Supervision: review, leave and ma
- Page 182 and 183:
8 8.6 The Adult Parole Board review
- Page 184 and 185:
8 8.17 In terms of the review of su
- Page 186 and 187:
8 8.28 The court must not vary a cu
- Page 188 and 189:
8 8.42 In 2011-12, five forensic pa
- Page 190 and 191:
8 Table 5: Types of leave available
- Page 192 and 193:
8 On-ground leave and limited off-g
- Page 194 and 195:
8 8.77 The same criteria outlined a
- Page 196 and 197:
8 Leave decision-making bodies 8.90
- Page 198 and 199:
8 Operation of the Internal Leave R
- Page 200 and 201:
8 subject to a non-custodial superv
- Page 202 and 203:
8 8.128 In its preliminary research
- Page 204 and 205:
8 8.141 Upon arrival in Victoria, t
- Page 206 and 207:
9 Decision making and interests und
- Page 208 and 209:
9 The flexibility in the system 9.4
- Page 210 and 211:
9 Decision making in the CMIA super
- Page 212 and 213:
9 9.23 First, it is difficult to de
- Page 214 and 215:
9 9.33 People who have been unfit t
- Page 216 and 217:
9 Principles and matters the Forens
- Page 218 and 219:
9 9.49 Evidently, the emphasis the
- Page 220 and 221:
9 Other models of decision making 9
- Page 222 and 223:
9 Representation of interests Repre
- Page 224 and 225:
9 9.81 Reports by victims and famil
- Page 226 and 227:
9 Leave and extended leave appeals
- Page 228 and 229:
9 9.103 Before NOM, the Department
- Page 230 and 231:
9 9.109 Further, people with intell
- Page 232 and 233:
9 9.121 In Re PL, Justice Cummins s
- Page 234 and 235:
A Appendices 214 Appendix A: Flowch
- Page 236 and 237:
B Appendix B: Jurisdictional compar
- Page 238 and 239:
B South Australia Criminal Law Cons
- Page 240 and 241:
B New Zealand Crimes Act 1961 (NZ)
- Page 242 and 243:
Questions Q
- Page 244 and 245:
Q Issues specific to the Presser cr
- Page 246 and 247:
Q The test for establishing the def
- Page 248 and 249:
Q 57 If yes, should the power to ma
- Page 250 and 251:
Q Breaches of supervision orders 81