04.01.2015 Views

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission<br />

Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper<br />

The role of lawyers in the process for determining unfitness to stand trial<br />

4.87 The process of determining unfitness to stand trial under the CMIA begins when the<br />

question of an accused person’s unfitness to stand trial arises. <strong>Law</strong>yers, particularly<br />

defence lawyers, are often the ones who will raise the question of unfitness to stand trial.<br />

4.88 The Commission’s preliminary research suggests that lawyers who represent accused<br />

people who may be unfit to stand trial often face a number of ethical issues.<br />

4.89 One ethical issue that can arise concerns the decision whether to raise the question of<br />

unfitness to stand trial on behalf of the client and consequently take the client through<br />

the CMIA process. This can be a difficult decision particularly when their client may be<br />

unable to provide instructions concerning what path they want to take. Where this is the<br />

case, a lawyer may be in a position where they have to make a decision on behalf of the<br />

client. In making this decision, a lawyer may feel conflicted between the benefits of the<br />

CMIA process for their client (for example, the availability of a special hearing process and<br />

the absence of recorded conviction and a sentence of imprisonment) and its potential<br />

drawbacks (for example, the indeterminate period of supervision).<br />

4.90 The <strong>Law</strong> Reform Committee observed:<br />

The primary challenge experienced by lawyers when working with clients with an<br />

intellectual disability or cognitive impairment is that clients often lack the ability to<br />

provide effective and adequate instructions. Conversely, a lawyer may lack experience<br />

working with people with intellectual disabilities or cognitive impairments, and may not<br />

communicate effectively with the client. 116<br />

4.91 Another ethical issue that may arise quite frequently involves the difficulty experienced<br />

by lawyers in obtaining instructions from clients on how to proceed in a special hearing<br />

after they have been found unfit to stand trial. For example, the client may be unable to<br />

instruct their lawyer on whether they want to raise any defences to the charge, such as<br />

the mental impairment defence, which raises questions about the obligations of lawyers<br />

in these circumstances.<br />

Questions<br />

17 What ethical issues do lawyers face in the process for determining unfitness to<br />

stand trial<br />

18 What is the best way of addressing these ethical issues from a legislative or<br />

policy perspective<br />

72<br />

116 Ibid 205.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!