Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission<br />
Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper<br />
The role of lawyers in the process for determining unfitness to stand trial<br />
4.87 The process of determining unfitness to stand trial under the CMIA begins when the<br />
question of an accused person’s unfitness to stand trial arises. <strong>Law</strong>yers, particularly<br />
defence lawyers, are often the ones who will raise the question of unfitness to stand trial.<br />
4.88 The Commission’s preliminary research suggests that lawyers who represent accused<br />
people who may be unfit to stand trial often face a number of ethical issues.<br />
4.89 One ethical issue that can arise concerns the decision whether to raise the question of<br />
unfitness to stand trial on behalf of the client and consequently take the client through<br />
the CMIA process. This can be a difficult decision particularly when their client may be<br />
unable to provide instructions concerning what path they want to take. Where this is the<br />
case, a lawyer may be in a position where they have to make a decision on behalf of the<br />
client. In making this decision, a lawyer may feel conflicted between the benefits of the<br />
CMIA process for their client (for example, the availability of a special hearing process and<br />
the absence of recorded conviction and a sentence of imprisonment) and its potential<br />
drawbacks (for example, the indeterminate period of supervision).<br />
4.90 The <strong>Law</strong> Reform Committee observed:<br />
The primary challenge experienced by lawyers when working with clients with an<br />
intellectual disability or cognitive impairment is that clients often lack the ability to<br />
provide effective and adequate instructions. Conversely, a lawyer may lack experience<br />
working with people with intellectual disabilities or cognitive impairments, and may not<br />
communicate effectively with the client. 116<br />
4.91 Another ethical issue that may arise quite frequently involves the difficulty experienced<br />
by lawyers in obtaining instructions from clients on how to proceed in a special hearing<br />
after they have been found unfit to stand trial. For example, the client may be unable to<br />
instruct their lawyer on whether they want to raise any defences to the charge, such as<br />
the mental impairment defence, which raises questions about the obligations of lawyers<br />
in these circumstances.<br />
Questions<br />
17 What ethical issues do lawyers face in the process for determining unfitness to<br />
stand trial<br />
18 What is the best way of addressing these ethical issues from a legislative or<br />
policy perspective<br />
72<br />
116 Ibid 205.