Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission<br />
Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper<br />
6.77 Participants in the ARC List are required to attend regular hearings during the course<br />
of their participation (that may be up to 12 months) where their issues and progress in<br />
addressing them are discussed. The list relies on ‘therapeutic jurisprudence principles’ that<br />
take into account the participant’s mental illness or cognitive impairment. 108 A magistrate<br />
supervises the list, supported by a program manager and clinical or case advisors who<br />
provide support to the participants throughout their involvement with the list. An<br />
evaluation of the ARC List has been conducted by KPMG but is not publicly available. The<br />
ARC List is widely regarded as a valuable initiative.<br />
Courts Integrated Services Program (CISP)<br />
6.78 CISP commenced operation in early 2007. It is a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation program<br />
established by the Magistrates’ Court in collaboration with the Department of Justice to<br />
ensure that accused people receive appropriate treatment and support services with the<br />
aim of promoting safer communities by reducing re-offending. It provides referrals or links<br />
for the participant to drug and alcohol treatment, crisis accommodation, disability services<br />
and mental health services. The program currently operates in Melbourne, Sunshine and<br />
Latrobe Valley Magistrates’ Courts.<br />
6.79 CISP provides case management by:<br />
• providing participants with short-term assistance to address their health and social<br />
needs<br />
• working on the causes of their offending through individualised case management<br />
support<br />
• helping them gain access to treatment and community support services.<br />
6.80 CISP participants can be involved in the program for up to four months. A recent<br />
evaluation of CISP found that ‘compared with offenders at other court venues, offenders<br />
who completed CISP showed a significantly lower rate of re-offending in the months after<br />
they exited the program’. 109<br />
<strong>Mental</strong> Health Court Liaison Service (MHCLS)<br />
6.81 The <strong>Mental</strong> Health Court Liaison Service (MHCLS), provided by Forensicare, is a<br />
court-based assessment and advice service. The main role of the MHCLS is to provide<br />
mental state assessments and advice regarding the management and needs of accused<br />
people, and if necessary, referring people to area mental health services for treatment<br />
and case management. The MHCLS sometimes undertakes assessments for the purpose<br />
of determining whether an accused person is unfit to stand trial. Forensicare provides the<br />
assessment service to seven metropolitan Magistrates’ Courts and there are four regional<br />
roles that are provided by local area mental health services.<br />
Diversion if the CMIA is further extended to the Magistrates’ Court<br />
6.82 At present, the ARC List and CISP are not designed to include accused people who are<br />
unfit to stand trial (or people who are found criminally responsible following a finding of<br />
unfitness) or those who would qualify for a defence of mental impairment. This can be<br />
contrasted with the South Australian diversion program that aims to provide a diversion<br />
option in the Magistrates’ Court for people who may otherwise put forward a defence of<br />
mental impairment. Any expansion of the ARC List or CISP to people found unfit to stand<br />
trial or not guilty because of mental impairment would require a change in the respective<br />
criteria for eligibility.<br />
132<br />
108 Ibid 57.<br />
109 Stuart Ross, Evaluation of the Court Integrated Services Program - Final Report (2012) 5.