04.01.2015 Views

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission<br />

Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper<br />

6.77 Participants in the ARC List are required to attend regular hearings during the course<br />

of their participation (that may be up to 12 months) where their issues and progress in<br />

addressing them are discussed. The list relies on ‘therapeutic jurisprudence principles’ that<br />

take into account the participant’s mental illness or cognitive impairment. 108 A magistrate<br />

supervises the list, supported by a program manager and clinical or case advisors who<br />

provide support to the participants throughout their involvement with the list. An<br />

evaluation of the ARC List has been conducted by KPMG but is not publicly available. The<br />

ARC List is widely regarded as a valuable initiative.<br />

Courts Integrated Services Program (CISP)<br />

6.78 CISP commenced operation in early 2007. It is a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation program<br />

established by the Magistrates’ Court in collaboration with the Department of Justice to<br />

ensure that accused people receive appropriate treatment and support services with the<br />

aim of promoting safer communities by reducing re-offending. It provides referrals or links<br />

for the participant to drug and alcohol treatment, crisis accommodation, disability services<br />

and mental health services. The program currently operates in Melbourne, Sunshine and<br />

Latrobe Valley Magistrates’ Courts.<br />

6.79 CISP provides case management by:<br />

• providing participants with short-term assistance to address their health and social<br />

needs<br />

• working on the causes of their offending through individualised case management<br />

support<br />

• helping them gain access to treatment and community support services.<br />

6.80 CISP participants can be involved in the program for up to four months. A recent<br />

evaluation of CISP found that ‘compared with offenders at other court venues, offenders<br />

who completed CISP showed a significantly lower rate of re-offending in the months after<br />

they exited the program’. 109<br />

<strong>Mental</strong> Health Court Liaison Service (MHCLS)<br />

6.81 The <strong>Mental</strong> Health Court Liaison Service (MHCLS), provided by Forensicare, is a<br />

court-based assessment and advice service. The main role of the MHCLS is to provide<br />

mental state assessments and advice regarding the management and needs of accused<br />

people, and if necessary, referring people to area mental health services for treatment<br />

and case management. The MHCLS sometimes undertakes assessments for the purpose<br />

of determining whether an accused person is unfit to stand trial. Forensicare provides the<br />

assessment service to seven metropolitan Magistrates’ Courts and there are four regional<br />

roles that are provided by local area mental health services.<br />

Diversion if the CMIA is further extended to the Magistrates’ Court<br />

6.82 At present, the ARC List and CISP are not designed to include accused people who are<br />

unfit to stand trial (or people who are found criminally responsible following a finding of<br />

unfitness) or those who would qualify for a defence of mental impairment. This can be<br />

contrasted with the South Australian diversion program that aims to provide a diversion<br />

option in the Magistrates’ Court for people who may otherwise put forward a defence of<br />

mental impairment. Any expansion of the ARC List or CISP to people found unfit to stand<br />

trial or not guilty because of mental impairment would require a change in the respective<br />

criteria for eligibility.<br />

132<br />

108 Ibid 57.<br />

109 Stuart Ross, Evaluation of the Court Integrated Services Program - Final Report (2012) 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!