Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5<br />
Jury involvement in the process and consent mental impairment hearings<br />
5.95 The role of the jury is to determine whether the accused person was suffering from a<br />
mental impairment at the time of committing the offence. For example, if expert evidence<br />
indicates that the accused person was suffering from schizophrenia, the jury must<br />
determine if at the time of committing the offence, the accused person’s symptoms were<br />
consistent with schizophrenia.<br />
5.96 In its defences to homicide reference, the Commission consulted on issues in relation to<br />
‘by consent’ mental impairment hearings and considered that empanelling a jury in these<br />
cases was ‘both unnecessary and inappropriate’. 83 The Commission found that the role of<br />
the jury in these cases was not to make a determination on the evidence but to confirm<br />
the view of the defence and prosecution. The Commission therefore argued that the<br />
process of empanelling a jury where both the prosecution and defence agreed on the<br />
evidence that the defence of mental impairment had been established undermined the<br />
role of the jury and ‘may lead to a loss of faith in the jury system’. 84<br />
5.97 The CMIA was amended to allow for by consent mental impairment hearings. 85 If the<br />
prosecution and defence both agree that the evidence has established the defence<br />
of mental impairment, the trial judge may decide a jury is not required to make a<br />
determination. 86<br />
5.98 Instead, the trial judge alone may hear evidence and:<br />
• direct that a verdict of not guilty because of mental impairment be recorded if the<br />
judge is satisfied on the evidence that the defence of mental impairment has been<br />
established, 87 or<br />
• must direct that the person be tried by a jury if the judge is not satisfied on the<br />
evidence that the defence of mental impairment has been established. 88<br />
5.99 It is unclear whether a consent mental impairment hearing is available after a finding of<br />
unfitness as discussed in Chapter 4 from [4.110].<br />
Question<br />
41 Should there be any changes to the current processes for jury involvement in<br />
hearings and consent mental impairment hearings<br />
83 <strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission, above n 1, 229.<br />
84 Ibid 230.<br />
85 <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 (Vic) s 21(4).<br />
86 Ibid.<br />
87 Ibid s 21(4)(a).<br />
88 Ibid s 21(4)(b).<br />
103