Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission<br />
Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper<br />
Unfitness to stand trial under the CMIA<br />
<strong>Law</strong><br />
4.11 The CMIA introduced a new process to determine an accused person’s unfitness to stand<br />
trial and provides for the system in Victoria today. Under the CMIA, an accused person<br />
is presumed to be fit to stand trial. 8 This is the case even where an accused person has<br />
previously been found unfit to stand trial. The presumption is rebutted if it is established,<br />
following an investigation by a jury, that the accused person is unfit to stand trial. 9 Under<br />
the CMIA, an accused person is unfit to stand trial for an offence if, because their mental<br />
processes are disordered or impaired, they are or, at some time during the trial, will be:<br />
• unable to understand the nature of the charge<br />
• unable to enter a plea to the charge and to exercise the right to challenge jurors or<br />
the jury<br />
• unable to understand the nature of the trial<br />
• unable to follow the course of the trial<br />
• unable to understand the substantial effect of any evidence given against them<br />
• unable to give instructions to their legal practitioner. 10<br />
4.12 Each of these criteria stands alone. An accused person need only satisfy one of the above<br />
criteria to be found unfit to stand trial.<br />
Process<br />
4.13 Figure 1 shows the key stages of the unfitness to stand trial process under the CMIA.<br />
A question of an accused person’s unfitness may be raised at any stage in a court<br />
proceeding. If raised, the question of whether a person is unfit to stand trial is a question<br />
of fact for determination by a jury on the balance of probabilities in an unfitness<br />
investigation in either the Supreme Court or County Court. The jury must make a finding<br />
that the accused person is fit or unfit to stand trial for the offence charged.<br />
4.14 If a jury finds the accused person unfit to stand trial, the judge must determine whether<br />
that person is likely to become fit to stand trial within 12 months. 11 If the judge<br />
determines that the accused person is likely to become fit and they do become fit after<br />
a period of adjournment, the trial will proceed. 12 If a jury finds that the accused person is<br />
unfit, the person has a right to appeal the finding of unfitness to the Court of Appeal. 13<br />
If the judge determines that the accused person is not likely to become fit within<br />
12 months, or remains unfit after the period of adjournment, 14 a special hearing must be<br />
conducted before a jury to determine whether the person:<br />
• is not guilty of the offence (a complete acquittal)<br />
• is not guilty of the offence because of mental impairment, or<br />
• committed the offence. 15<br />
4.15 A special hearing is conducted as closely as possible to a criminal trial. 16 The accused<br />
person found unfit to stand trial is assumed to have pleaded not guilty to the offence. 17<br />
54<br />
8 <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 (Vic) s 7(1).<br />
9 Ibid ss 7(2), (3).<br />
10 Ibid s 6.<br />
11 Ibid s 11(4).<br />
12 Ibid s 14(4).<br />
13 Ibid s 14A.<br />
14 Ibid ss 12(5), 14(2).<br />
15 Ibid s 17(1).<br />
16 Ibid s 16(1).<br />
17 Ibid s 16(2)(a).