04.01.2015 Views

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission<br />

Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Impairment</strong> and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper<br />

5.56 Prior to the introduction of the CMIA, the <strong>Victorian</strong> Parliamentary Community<br />

Development Committee in its review of the Governor’s pleasure regime recommended<br />

introducing a statutory definition of mental impairment. 51<br />

5.57 While appreciating the need for flexibility in interpreting the term ‘mental impairment’,<br />

the Community Development Committee acknowledged that ‘both the category of<br />

people likely to plead the insanity defence, their families and their legal counsel should be<br />

provided with some statutory guidance as to what the term means’ and recommended a<br />

statutory definition be developed. 52<br />

5.58 The issue was re-examined in the Commission’s defences to homicide report. In<br />

that report, the Commission recommended retaining the current defence of mental<br />

impairment without including a statutory definition of mental impairment.<br />

5.59 The Commission’s report argued that difficulties in adequately defining the term ‘mental<br />

impairment’ would mean that any definition would be equally problematic and subject to<br />

criticism as having no definition at all. 53<br />

5.60 The complexities in developing a definition of mental impairment were highlighted by<br />

McSherry and Naylor:<br />

One of the initial difficulties with this criterion [for the defence of mental impairment] is<br />

that a clear definition of mental impairment, or even mental illness, has eluded members<br />

of the medical as well as the legal professions. 54<br />

5.61 Consultations undertaken as part of the Commission’s defences to homicide report<br />

indicated that the defence was working well in practice and leaving the term undefined<br />

would ensure flexibility in its application. 55 The review instead recommended that a<br />

provision be added to the CMIA that specifies what the term ‘mental impairment’<br />

includes but is not limited to the common law notion of ‘disease of the mind’. 56<br />

5.62 In March 2013, the <strong>Victorian</strong> Parliament <strong>Law</strong> Reform Committee released a report, Inquiry<br />

into Access to and Interaction with the Justice System by People with an Intellectual<br />

Disability and their Families and Carers, that acknowledged there is ambiguity in the<br />

meaning of the term ‘mental impairment’ and recommended that a statutory definition<br />

be developed.<br />

Questions<br />

29 How does the defence of mental impairment work in practice with ‘mental<br />

impairment’ undefined<br />

30 Should ‘mental impairment’ be defined under the CMIA<br />

31 What are the advantages or disadvantages of including a definition of mental<br />

impairment in the CMIA<br />

96<br />

51 Community Development Committee, Parliament of Victoria, Inquiry into Persons Detained at the Governor’s Pleasure (1995) 172.<br />

52 Ibid 151.<br />

53 Ibid 212.<br />

54 McSherry and Naylor, above n 25, 531.<br />

55 Community Development Committee, above n 51, 208–9.<br />

56 <strong>Victorian</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission, above n 1, 217.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!