Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4 Unfitness to stand trial 52 Introduction 53 Unfitness to stand trial prior to the CMIA: ‘Fitness to plead’ 54 Unfitness to stand trial under the CMIA 56 Test for determining unfitness to stand trial 70 The process for investigating unfitness to stand trial 80 Special hearings to determine criminal responsibility 82 Appeals against findings of unfitness to stand trial and findings at special hearings
Victorian Law Reform Commission Review of the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997: Consultation Paper 4. Unfitness to stand trial Introduction 4.1 ‘Unfitness to stand trial’ refers to the doctrine which exempts an accused person from a usual trial, sometimes temporarily, because at the time of the trial they cannot understand the trial or participate in it, or are, in other words, ‘unfit to stand trial’. 1 Unlike the defence of mental impairment, discussed in Chapter 5, which concerns the accused person’s mental condition at the time of the offence, unfitness to stand trial relates to the accused person’s mental condition at the time they are involved in court proceedings. 4.2 There are a number of justifications for the requirement that an accused person is fit to stand trial: • To avoid inaccurate verdicts—Forcing an accused person to be answerable for their actions where they are incapable of doing so could lead to an inaccurate verdict. 2 • To maintain the ‘moral dignity’ of the trial process—Requiring that an accused person is fit to stand trial recognises the importance of maintaining the moral dignity of the trial process. It ensures that the person is able to form a link between their alleged crime and their trial or punishment and be accountable for their actions. 3 • To avoid unfairness—The final justification often cited for the requirement that an accused person is fit to stand trial is that it would be unfair or inhumane to subject someone who is unfit to the trial process. 4 4.3 This chapter examines the determination of unfitness to stand trial under the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 (Vic) (CMIA). It briefly explores the historical foundations of the law on unfitness to stand trial and the current law governing the process. The chapter discusses a number of specific aspects of the law on unfitness to stand trial, such as the unfitness to stand trial test and the conduct of special hearings, and seeks to identify whether there are any issues in relation to the way the law operates. The terms of reference specifically ask the Commission to consider whether the process of determining unfitness to stand trial can be improved. This chapter also considers issues relating to the process of determining unfitness to stand trial, including procedural requirements, the role of lawyers and experts, jury involvement, special hearings and the length of the process. 4.4 Throughout the chapter, the Commission asks a number of questions about possible changes to the law and what form any changes should take. 52 1 Arlie Loughnan, Manifest Madness: Mental Incapacity in Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1st ed, 2012) 67. 2 R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge University Press, 1986) 119. 3 Richard J Bonnie, ‘The Competence of Criminal Defendants: A Theoretical Reformulation’ (1992) 10(3) Behavioural Sciences and the Law 291, 295. 4 R v Cumming [2006] 2 NZLR 597, 608.
Page 1 and 2:
Review of the Crimes (Mental Impair
Page 3 and 4:
Published by the Victorian Law Refo
Page 5 and 6:
Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22: xviii
Page 23 and 24: Victorian Law Reform Commission Rev
Page 30 and 31: 2 The CMIA: background and principl
Page 32 and 33: 2 2.6 For the vast majority of peop
Page 34 and 35: 2 2.16 Prior to these reviews, the
Page 36 and 37: 2 Previous reviews of provisions in
Page 38 and 39: 2 Victorian Parliament Law Reform C
Page 40 and 41: 2 criminal law, 44 and is also reco
Page 42 and 43: 2 Protection of the community 2.62
Page 44 and 45: 2 Family members of people subject
Page 46 and 47: 2 2.94 The CMIA’s therapeutic aim
Page 48 and 49: 2 Principles governing the treatmen
Page 50: 2 Victorian law Mental Health Act 1
Page 74 and 75: 4 4.5 As stated in [4.11] below, un
Page 76 and 77: 4 4.16 If an accused person is foun
Page 78 and 79: 4 The test in Victoria: the ‘Pres
Page 80 and 81: 4 Decision-making capacity or effec
Page 82 and 83: 4 Question 3 Should the test for un
Page 84 and 85: 4 or rational appreciation of the p
Page 86 and 87: 4 4.57 However, expressly recognisi
Page 88 and 89: 4 4.65 Some jurisdictions have legi
Page 90 and 91: 4 Difficulty in assessing unfitness
Page 92 and 93: 4 Requirement to ‘plead’ in a c
Page 94 and 95: 4 The role of experts in the proces
Page 96 and 97: 4 4.102 More broadly, some have que
Page 98 and 99: 4 4.113 In DPP v CJC (CJC), 135 Jus
Page 100 and 101: 4 4.121 The Law Reform Committee re
Page 102 and 103: 4 Directions to the jury on finding
Page 104: 4 4.141 It is unclear why appeals a
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
112
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
134
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
158
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
184
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
220
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251:
show all

Crimes Mental Impairment consultation paper.pdf - Victorian Law ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?