Handbook for Quality Assurance in Higher Education The ... - TCU
Handbook for Quality Assurance in Higher Education The ... - TCU
Handbook for Quality Assurance in Higher Education The ... - TCU
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g is a process that enables comparison of <strong>in</strong>puts, processes or outputs between<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutions (or parts of <strong>in</strong>stitutions) or with<strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>stitution over time. It is important <strong>for</strong><br />
a faculty to compare its programs with equivalent programs <strong>in</strong> the country, the region and<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternationally. Also the per<strong>for</strong>mance can be compared.<br />
Look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> evidence<br />
• Is the university us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>strument of benchmark<strong>in</strong>g? How is it us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>strument?<br />
• Does the executive management use the collected <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation?<br />
• What is done with the benchmark<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
17. <strong>The</strong> achievements: the graduates<br />
<strong>The</strong> proof of the pudd<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> the eat<strong>in</strong>g. In assess<strong>in</strong>g our quality we have to look not only at<br />
the quality of our process, but also have to take <strong>in</strong>to account the output. First of all, we must<br />
look at our graduates. Did they achieve the expected standards? Are the achieved outcomes<br />
equal to the expected outcomes? Have the graduates acquired the expected knowledge,<br />
skills and attitudes? How far the program has achieved its expected learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes can<br />
be measured aga<strong>in</strong>st several criteria as stipulated below:<br />
a. <strong>The</strong> profile of the graduates<br />
• <strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al qualifications achieved by the graduates are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the <strong>for</strong>mulated<br />
expected learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes of the program.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> content and level of the graduation projects are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the degree<br />
(bachelor’s or master’s) awarded.<br />
• Graduates are able to operate adequately <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>for</strong> which they have been<br />
tra<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Explanation<br />
<strong>Quality</strong> has been <strong>for</strong>mulated as achiev<strong>in</strong>g our objectives <strong>in</strong> an efficient and effective way,<br />
assum<strong>in</strong>g that the goals and aims reflect the requirements of all our stakeholders <strong>in</strong> an<br />
adequate way. <strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al test of our quality is the graduate. Did he or she really achieve the<br />
expected learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes? This is not easy to measure and can only be known by means of<br />
feedback from the labour market and feedback from alumni.<br />
Look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> evidence<br />
- Is the average standard of our graduate satisfactory?<br />
- Do the achieved standards match the expected standards?<br />
- Do our graduates easily get jobs? Are the jobs that the graduates get <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />
with the level of graduation?<br />
- Have any changes been signalled <strong>in</strong> the labour market prospects of graduates over the<br />
last few years? What are the prospects?<br />
Guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> Self Assessment<br />
31<br />
IUCEA/ CHE/ NCHE/ <strong>TCU</strong>/ DAAD