19.01.2015 Views

SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...

SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...

SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suicide <strong>in</strong> rural and remote areas <strong>of</strong> Australia 51<br />

H<strong>is</strong>tory <strong>of</strong> suicidal behaviour and<br />

mental health<br />

Previous suicide attempt(s) came out as a signifi cant<br />

suicide predictor <strong>in</strong> both urban and rural regions<br />

(Table 12). Compar<strong>is</strong>ons between rural and urban<br />

suicide cases showed that, while th<strong>is</strong> was more<br />

frequent <strong>in</strong> rural (60%) than <strong>in</strong> urban cases (49.3%),<br />

it was not signifi cant. A suicide <strong>in</strong> the family and/or<br />

friends was signifi cant <strong>in</strong> urban areas but, despite<br />

considerable differences between suicide (46.9%)<br />

and sudden-death control (26.9%) groups, did not<br />

reach signifi cance <strong>in</strong> rural areas probably due to the<br />

limited sample size. In both urban and rural areas,<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g regard<strong>in</strong>g suicide<br />

<strong>in</strong> the media, stockpil<strong>in</strong>g pills, mak<strong>in</strong>g statements<br />

<strong>of</strong> hopelessness, and say<strong>in</strong>g or do<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

else to <strong>in</strong>dicate the presence <strong>of</strong> suicidality were all<br />

signifi cant predictors <strong>for</strong> suicide. However, these<br />

factors were not signifi cantly different between rural<br />

and urban suicide cases.<br />

signifi cant <strong>in</strong> urban areas (Table 13). Substance<br />

abuse d<strong>is</strong>orders were similarly high <strong>in</strong> suicide and<br />

sudden-death control groups <strong>in</strong> rural areas (38% <strong>in</strong><br />

suicide cases and 30.8% <strong>in</strong> sudden deaths).<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g at least one psychiatric d<strong>is</strong>order at the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> death (as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the SCID-I) was an<br />

important r<strong>is</strong>k factor <strong>for</strong> suicide compared to sudden<br />

death <strong>in</strong> both regions. However, the r<strong>is</strong>k was higher<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> odds ratios (OR; Table 13).<br />

Consequently, compared to the urban suicide cases<br />

(70%), there was a signifi cantly higher prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

psychiatric diagnoses <strong>in</strong> rural suicide cases (84%)<br />

(χ²=3.77, df=1, p=0.05). In rural and urban regions,<br />

mood (54% <strong>in</strong> rural and 51.3% <strong>in</strong> urban suicide<br />

cases), anxiety (40% <strong>in</strong> rural and 20% <strong>in</strong> urban suicide<br />

cases, a stat<strong>is</strong>tically signifi cant difference: χ²=8.00,<br />

df=1, p=0.005) and substance abuse d<strong>is</strong>orders<br />

(38% <strong>in</strong> rural and 26.7% <strong>in</strong> urban suicide cases)<br />

were most prevalent. Mood and anxiety d<strong>is</strong>orders<br />

were signifi cant predictors <strong>of</strong> suicide <strong>in</strong> both areas;<br />

however, substance abuse d<strong>is</strong>orders were only<br />

GriffithBook FINAL 20/09.<strong>in</strong>dd 51<br />

15/11/12 4:28 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!